2002
DOI: 10.1080/13537110208428651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Democratic transition in the Balkans: Romania's Hungarian and Bulgaria's Turkish minority (1989–99)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent attempts have been implemented to improve the relationships between the majority Romanian population and the numerous minorities (Butuca, 2003), including the visible minorities of the Hungarians and the Rroma. It has been argued that during the process of democratization in the transitional post-communist era, Romania has succeeded in maintaining civil order while some of its neighboring countries in the Balkans experienced violent ethnic conflict (Johnson, 2002). Although this success has been attributed to external forces (such as interventions by the European Commission) by some (Chiva, 2006), and internal forces by others (Johnson, 2002), it seems that an atmosphere of tolerance of minority populations is evident in the country.…”
Section: Geographical and Historical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been argued that during the process of democratization in the transitional post-communist era, Romania has succeeded in maintaining civil order while some of its neighboring countries in the Balkans experienced violent ethnic conflict (Johnson, 2002). Although this success has been attributed to external forces (such as interventions by the European Commission) by some (Chiva, 2006), and internal forces by others (Johnson, 2002), it seems that an atmosphere of tolerance of minority populations is evident in the country. This projected image to the international community is problematized by Cajvaneanu (2004), who argues that tolerance does not equal integration or equal status.…”
Section: Geographical and Historical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exploring the determinants of ethnic party formation and success could be instructive not only to ethnic minorities themselves, but also to national and international actors concerned with political and societal stability. Existing literature reveals that EMPs can be highly influential actors in domestic politics (Jiglau and Ghergina ), boost political participation within the ethnic group they represent (Ishiyama ), prevent minority ethnic conflict (Birnir ; Ishiyama ; Johnson ), help manage interethnic relations during democratic transitions (Mihailescu ) and help stabilize and sustain democracy (Chandra ; Birnir ). With so many studies pointing to the influence – on minority groups and on the broader society alike – of EMPs, it is imperative that we examine what factors contribute to their emergence and success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%