2003
DOI: 10.1076/lpos.2.2.93.15544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Democratic Schools, Democratic Communities: Reflections in an International Context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our respondents from Osijek and Maribor noticed content on children’s rights and participation during their school practice, studies conducted in their countries nevertheless indicate an insufficient presence of children’s rights and participation in schools (Jeđud Borić, 2015; Mithans et al, 2017). This finding can also be interpreted from another aspect: children’s rights, their realization in school, as well as the practice of participation skills imply a democratic, and not an authoritarian school climate (Seashore Louis, 2003); and a certain amount of autonomy—of the teachers in relation to the official curricula (MacMath, 2008), and the students in relation to everyday school activities (Bickmore, 2014). In that sense, if future teachers perceived schools in which they attended school practice as democratic environments, it is possible that this factor decisively influenced their perception of the presence of children’s rights and participation (Osijek, Maribor).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our respondents from Osijek and Maribor noticed content on children’s rights and participation during their school practice, studies conducted in their countries nevertheless indicate an insufficient presence of children’s rights and participation in schools (Jeđud Borić, 2015; Mithans et al, 2017). This finding can also be interpreted from another aspect: children’s rights, their realization in school, as well as the practice of participation skills imply a democratic, and not an authoritarian school climate (Seashore Louis, 2003); and a certain amount of autonomy—of the teachers in relation to the official curricula (MacMath, 2008), and the students in relation to everyday school activities (Bickmore, 2014). In that sense, if future teachers perceived schools in which they attended school practice as democratic environments, it is possible that this factor decisively influenced their perception of the presence of children’s rights and participation (Osijek, Maribor).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second and third waves of teacher leadership underscored the importance of democratic schools where rigid hierarchies did not separate teachers and administrators (e.g., Seashore Louis, 2003). While the theorized fourth wave of teacher leadership (see Berry, 2011) accelerates progress toward more democratic schools, we found limited instances of the fourth wave’s existence in KSD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Gardiner and Enomoto (2006) revealed the deficit in principals' awareness of the connections between affirming diversity and student achievement. Seashore (2003) emphasized the need for strong democratic school leadership practices that support newcomer families at the school and district levels, and the need to include all parties (teachers, students, parents, and leaders) in decision-making. Riehl (2000), Dimmock and Walker (2005) advocated for school leadership practices that are responsive to culturally diverse groups, i.e., practices that: (a) foster cultural diversity; (b) exemplify inclusive instructional practice;…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%