Democracy without choice: Citizens’ perceptions of government autonomy during the Eurozone crisis

Abstract

In this article it is argued that citizens take into account the degree of a government's political autonomy to implement particular policies when expressing their views on satisfaction with democracy (SWD) but, in order to do so, they need to perceive it. When citizens directly observe the external constraints that reduce their government's autonomy, then variations in levels of regime satisfaction may no longer be exclusively about government performance – as widely argued by political economists – but also about democratic choice. The argument develops after comparing the existing scenarios in the Eurozone before and after the Great Recession. Citizens only began to perceive their own lack of choice to decide between policy alternatives when the sovereign debt crisis broke out in May 2010, the date of the first Greek bail‐out. It is then when citizens started to update their beliefs about the functioning of democracy as a system in which alternative policies can be adopted as bail‐out deals were signed between national governments from the Euro periphery and the Troika. This updating process towards the way democracy works explains the increasing gap in the levels of SWD between bailed‐out economies and the rest of the countries in the Eurozone. Empirical confirmation for this claim is found after analysing Eurobarometer surveys from 2002 to 2014 and using a two‐step difference‐in‐difference analysis that combines individual and aggregate data.

The Coronavirus Pandemic and Voter Turnout: Addressing the Impact of Covid-19 on Electoral Participation

“…Lewis-Beck and Stegmaier, 2000), scholars have demonstrated how big economic shocks/crisis like the 1929 Great Repression and the 2008 Great Recession, can affect political trust(Foster and Frieden, 2017), government support(Achen and Bartels, 2016;Bartels, 2014;Dassonneville and Lewis-Beck, 2019) or satisfaction with democratic institutions(Foa and Mounk, 2016;Ruiz-Rufino and Alonso, 2017).…”

Revisiting the politicization of the EU. A three-dimensional approach

“…In turn, we expect this increased politicization to affect how citizens vote, and more specifically how at elections citizens reward or punish national incumbents (Lobo and Lewis-Beck 2012). The literature already suggests that the politicization of the eu is likely to be impacting voters' preferences on redistributive issues as well as their perception of who is in charge of the country's policies (Hutter and Kriesi 2016;Ruiz-Rufino and Alonso 2017). We expect that the Eurocrisis has accelerated this process particularly, as the events of the crisis may have raised citizens' awareness of the extent to which economic policies are coordinated at the supranational level.…”

Fiscal solidarity: The conditional role of political knowledge

“…In the case of the former, the question does not refer to respondents’ actual willingness to transfer money to another country, while in the case of the latter, the question asks the respondent to transfer part of his taxpayer’s money to a Eurozone country in crisis. In addition, according to Ruiz-Rufino and Alonso (2017: 327), awareness of the European political system has increased dramatically in the bail-out countries, while the growth of knowledge on this issue has been much slower in the creditor countries. Therefore, in a first round of model estimations, I enter a dummy variable for countries subject to EU conditionality and imposed austerity in the period between 2010 and 2014 as nations suffering severe economic and fiscal difficulties.…”