2015
DOI: 10.1017/s0007123415000447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Democracy by Demand? Reinvestigating the Effect of Self-expression Values on Political Regime Type

Abstract: The notion that cultural characterics influence political regimes remains popular, despite mixedsupporting evidence. In particular, democracy is argued to emerge and thrive in countries where liberal or freedom-oriented values (so-called self-expression values) are widespread. Inglehart and Welzel (2005), for instance, report such an effect, mainly drawing inferences from cross-country comparisons. Yet, cross-country correlations between selfexpression values and democracy could stem from different processes. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One notable advantage of TSCS data is its capacity to illuminate varying longitudinal processes between countries once within-country variation is separated from betweencountry variation. Previous studies using similar TSCS data did not distinguish between levels of analysis and instead assumed that there had to be only one longitudinal pattern that applies to all countries in the development of democracy [36] or individualism [6]. Unfortunately, this approach is limited in that (i) it cannot meaningfully interpret observed coefficients that reflect a mixture of both within-country and between-country processes, and (ii) it does not tap longitudinal patterns that might vary between countries.…”
Section: Varying Patterns Of Longitudinal Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One notable advantage of TSCS data is its capacity to illuminate varying longitudinal processes between countries once within-country variation is separated from betweencountry variation. Previous studies using similar TSCS data did not distinguish between levels of analysis and instead assumed that there had to be only one longitudinal pattern that applies to all countries in the development of democracy [36] or individualism [6]. Unfortunately, this approach is limited in that (i) it cannot meaningfully interpret observed coefficients that reflect a mixture of both within-country and between-country processes, and (ii) it does not tap longitudinal patterns that might vary between countries.…”
Section: Varying Patterns Of Longitudinal Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, previous longitudinal analyses omitted a general time trend as a covariate from the regression model (e.g. [6,36]). Inclusion of a time covariate ensures that a coefficient of a time-variant predictor represents a more meaningful estimate, that is, the extent to which the predictor explains the longitudinal variation of a dependent variable over and above the general time trend [39].…”
Section: Towards a More Comprehensive Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid sample-selection bias emerging from listwise deletion we conduct multiple imputation using Amelia II Honaker, King and Blackwell (2011). This has proven fruitful for the WVS data in particular (Dahlum and Knutsen, 2017). The imputation accounts for the time-series cross-sectional structure of the data, and produces a total of 5 different datasets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loks skal bent á að niðurstöður rannsókna hafa gefið til kynna breyttar áherslur og gildismat ungs fólks sem birtist í frjálslyndari skilningi þess á lýðraeðislegum borgaralegum skyldum, svo sem kosningaþátttöku. Rannsóknunum ber þó ekki saman um það hvort sjálfstjáningargildin efla lýðraeðislega þátttöku (Welzel og Inglehart, 2006) eða draga úr henni (Dahlum og Knutsen, 2017).…”
Section: Fraeðilegur Bakgrunnurunclassified