2012
DOI: 10.1109/tem.2011.2140323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demand Learning and Dynamic Pricing under Competition in a State-Space Framework

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a revenue optimization framework integrating demand learning and dynamic pricing for firms in monopoly or oligopoly markets. We introduce a state-space model for this revenue management problem, which incorporates game-theoretic demand dynamics and nonparametric techniques for estimating the evolution of underlying state variables. Under this framework, stringent model assumptions are removed. We develop a new demand learning algorithm using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods to estimat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been applied by a number of researchers to model monopolistic behaviors in supply chains, for example, the game‐theoretic model of Do Chung et al. (), the application in consumer lending by Boot and Thakor (), and the application in electronic retail market by Raju et al. (), among others.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been applied by a number of researchers to model monopolistic behaviors in supply chains, for example, the game‐theoretic model of Do Chung et al. (), the application in consumer lending by Boot and Thakor (), and the application in electronic retail market by Raju et al. (), among others.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most existing models, the demand intensity is assumed to be known. Dynamic pricing competition models with limited demand information are analyzed by Tsai, Hung (2009), Adida, Perakis (2010), Chung et al (2012, and Den Boer (2015b) using robust optimization and learning approaches. For a more comprehensive review, we refer to Chen, Chen (2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine-learning techniques that have been applied to dynamic pricing problems include evolutionary algorithms (Ramezani et al, 2011), particle swarm optimization (Mullen et al, 2006), reinforcement learning and Q-learning (Kutschinski et al, 2003, Raju et al, 2006, Könönen, 2006, Chinthalapati et al, 2006, Schwind, 2007, Cheng, 2008, Han et al, Vengerov, 2008, Cheng, 2009, Jintian and Lei, 2009, Han, 2010, Collins and Thomas, 2012, simulated annealing (Xia and Dube, 2007), Markov chain Monte Carlo methods (Chung et al, 2012), the aggregating algorithm (Levina et al, 2009) by Vovk (1990), goal-directed and derivative-following strategies in simulation (DiMicco et al, 2003), neural networks (Brooks et al, 1999, Kong, 2004, Ghose and Tran, 2009, Liu and Wang, 2013, and direct search methods (Brooks et al, 1999, Brooks et al, 2002.…”
Section: Machine-learning Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors propose an algorithm to solve the resulting differential variational inequalities, and illustrate their method by a numerical example. Related to the set-up of Kwon et al (2009) is the recent study by Chung et al (2012), who consider a state-space model for dynamic pricing and learning in an oligopoly. They also assume that expected demand depends on the difference between a posted price and a reference price, which is computed as a weighted moving average of historical prices.…”
Section: Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%