Abstract:This study examines the influence of households' socio-economic characteristics on household demand for electricity, petrol, diesel, kerosene, firewood, domestic gas, and transport in commercial vehicles. Primary data obtained in a cross-section survey of 90 households selected across six communities in Ijebu-Division of Ogun State, Nigeria was used in estimating a system of energy demand equations and elasticities. The study reveals that an average household in the sample had about five members, headed by a… Show more
“…The cost of electricity indicates that there was an increase from ₦2.30/KWH to ₦11.75/KWH between 2000 to 2012 in Nigeria with only a very small percentage connected to the national grid (Shittu et al, 2004;Babanyara and Saleh, 2010;Sambo, 2010;Abdrazack et al, 2012;Oyekale et al, 2012;Audu, 2013). This has pushed up the percentage of households that use other sources of fuels for cooking (Taru et al, 2011;Ojo and Chuffor, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that further research is needed on the household energy choices, in both urban and rural areas. There are existing studies on cooking energy in Nigeria (Alabe, 1996;Shittu et al, 2004;Adeleke and Jerome, 2006;Onyekuru and Eboh, 2011;Olatunwo and Adewumi, 2012;Oyekale et al, 2012). However, these studies did not compare energy choice between rural and urban households.…”
This study identified and compared the use of cooking energy among rural and urban households in Ogun State, Nigeria using a sample of 300 households. Empirical results indicate that electricity and gas are the least sources of cooking energy in rural area (RA) while firewood and electricity are least in urban area (UA). The level of education of the respondents was a significant (P < 0.05) factor influencing the probability of using charcoal and electricity in the RA relative to firewood, while there is a tendency towards positivity using charcoal, kerosene and gas relative to firewood with household size in UA. In addition, distance to energy source (P < 0.05), and household income (P < 0.01) significantly determine energy use in UA. Probability of using charcoal, electricity was also found to be significantly (P < 0.01) influenced by occupation and price of the cooking fuel, respectively, in a negative direction. In the UA, both income and price significantly influence the use of gas while only price influences its usage in the RA. There is therefore the need for price reduction and promotion of interventions that will enable low income earner to use cleaner and environmentally friendly energy source.
“…The cost of electricity indicates that there was an increase from ₦2.30/KWH to ₦11.75/KWH between 2000 to 2012 in Nigeria with only a very small percentage connected to the national grid (Shittu et al, 2004;Babanyara and Saleh, 2010;Sambo, 2010;Abdrazack et al, 2012;Oyekale et al, 2012;Audu, 2013). This has pushed up the percentage of households that use other sources of fuels for cooking (Taru et al, 2011;Ojo and Chuffor, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that further research is needed on the household energy choices, in both urban and rural areas. There are existing studies on cooking energy in Nigeria (Alabe, 1996;Shittu et al, 2004;Adeleke and Jerome, 2006;Onyekuru and Eboh, 2011;Olatunwo and Adewumi, 2012;Oyekale et al, 2012). However, these studies did not compare energy choice between rural and urban households.…”
This study identified and compared the use of cooking energy among rural and urban households in Ogun State, Nigeria using a sample of 300 households. Empirical results indicate that electricity and gas are the least sources of cooking energy in rural area (RA) while firewood and electricity are least in urban area (UA). The level of education of the respondents was a significant (P < 0.05) factor influencing the probability of using charcoal and electricity in the RA relative to firewood, while there is a tendency towards positivity using charcoal, kerosene and gas relative to firewood with household size in UA. In addition, distance to energy source (P < 0.05), and household income (P < 0.01) significantly determine energy use in UA. Probability of using charcoal, electricity was also found to be significantly (P < 0.01) influenced by occupation and price of the cooking fuel, respectively, in a negative direction. In the UA, both income and price significantly influence the use of gas while only price influences its usage in the RA. There is therefore the need for price reduction and promotion of interventions that will enable low income earner to use cleaner and environmentally friendly energy source.
“…dengan kenaikan pendapatan, bahkan berlaku juga untuk minyak tanah (Hughes-Cromwick, 1985; World Bank, 2003;Heltberg, 2005;Shittu et al, 2004, Rajmohan dan Weerahewa, 2007.…”
Urban Household Energy Consumption Analysis in Indonesia: Period of 2008 and 2011The goal of the study is to analyze the pattern and the change of urban household energy consumption and their determinant factors in Indonesia period of 2008 and 2011 using SUSENAS data of household budget survey. The concept of energy ladder and fuel stacking (multi fuel) are used to make a model of household energy consumption. The result of study shows that total energy consumption was increase in the period of 2008 and 2011. Coefficient of income elasticity toward both of modern and traditional energy consumption are positive, it means that there is rising consumption of energy along with the rising income. Household income is the main determinant factor of energy used by household besides other non-economic factors.Keywords: Energy Consumption; Energy Ladder; Household Energy AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pola dan perubahan konsumsi energi rumah tangga daerah perkotaan di Indonesia serta faktor-faktor yang memengaruhinya tahun 2008 dan 2011 dengan memanfaatkan data hasil survei pengeluaran rumah tangga SUSENAS. Konsep energy ladder dan fuel stacking (multi-fuel) diaplikasikan untuk membuat model konsumsi energi rumah tangga. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa konsumsi energi (total), modern, dan tradisional rumah tangga perkotaan mengalami kenaikan pada periode tahun 2008 dan 2011. Koefisien elastisitas pendapatan terhadap konsumsi energi modern dan tradisional bernilai positif, yang berarti bahwa terjadi peningkatan konsumsi energi modern dan tradisional sejalan dengan peningkatan pendapatan. Pendapatan rumah tangga adalah faktor yang paling menentukan konsumsi energi rumah tangga di samping faktor non-ekonomi lainnya seperti luas lantai rumah dan jumlah anggota rumah tangga.
“…Several authors and scholars have focused more on the oil sector and its hazards at the expense of traditional domestic energy used by households. The use of domestic energy supply, especially traditional methods for cooking, lighting, operating of appliances among others, has created indoor pollution, which when exposed to air for a long period construes several types of health problems (Shittu, Idowu, Otunaiya, & Ismail, 2004). Hence, this study examined the motivational factors of residents’ choice of domestic energy as well as the predominant ill‐health issues in the study area.…”
This study examined domestic energy usage and its health implication on residents of Ese-Odo and Okitipupa Local Government Areas (LGA), of Ondo State. Systematic random sampling was used to select 103 and 156 respondents in Ese-Odo and Okitipupa LGA, respectively. It was established that environmental and socioeconomic related attributes influenced residents' choice of domestic energy type. Similarly, burns, blindness, stroke, cataract and pulmonary diseases were the most prevalent self-reported ill-health. A relatively weak correlation between domestic energy usage and ill-health is experienced by the residents. Therefore, the study concluded that the use of traditional energy types had significant adverse effects on the health of the residents in Okitipupa and Ese-Odo LGAs of Ondo State. K E Y W O R D S domestic energy usage, health of residents, households' energy, self-reported ill-health of energy for cooking, heating, and lighting (Kowsari & Zerriffi, 2011). Such traditional biomass fuels are widely used particularly in developing countries. For instance, Onoja (2012) argued that evidence from China has shown that there are considerable numbers of households that are stick to traditional biomass fuel use despite their access to
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.