1995
DOI: 10.1016/0926-9851(95)90039-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delineation of shallow stratigraphy using ground penetrating radar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Geophysical methods such as GPR may be relevant for the estimation of the spatial variations of sub-surface features including the depth to saprolite upper boundary (e.g. Dominic et al, 1995;Lapen et al, 1996). At the same study site Chaplot et al (2001b) showed the interesting potential of the Radio Magneto Tellurique (RMT) in predicting the spatial variations of the depth to the saprolite upper boundary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Geophysical methods such as GPR may be relevant for the estimation of the spatial variations of sub-surface features including the depth to saprolite upper boundary (e.g. Dominic et al, 1995;Lapen et al, 1996). At the same study site Chaplot et al (2001b) showed the interesting potential of the Radio Magneto Tellurique (RMT) in predicting the spatial variations of the depth to the saprolite upper boundary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Common offset profile is the most common technique in GPR acquisition, mainly for large field, as in the case of agricultural applications. Furthermore, the representation of GPR data, by radar traces placed downward on sections, resembles well a soil cross section where the depth scale is expressed as a transformation of a two‐way travel time (Dominic et al ; Kruse et al ; Grasmueck, Weger and Horstmeyer ; Mount, Comas and Cunningham ). To estimate the electromagnetic waves’ propagation velocity within the different soil layers presented in the study area, the numerous hyperbolic diffraction curves presented in the radargrams were used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GPR record interpretation was based on correlation with cores, trenches, and open pits at or near profile lines. The interpretation of profile records was aided by criteria detailed in other GPR studies (Jol and Smith, 1991;Smith and Jol, 1992;Dominic et al, 1995;van Heteren et al, 1998). Terminology used to describe reflection configurations is that of van Heteren et al (1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%