2022
DOI: 10.1007/s42108-022-00188-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delineation of groundwater potential zones using GIS and AHP techniques in Coimbatore district, South India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding weightings assignment, lithology and resistivity had the most significant weights, as they were considered the most determining criteria for groundwater occurrence in the area. Compared to those above, criteria such as slope, texture and drainage density did not receive such high weights as in similar studies [15,17]. The calculated consistency ratio of less than 0.1 validated these considerations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding weightings assignment, lithology and resistivity had the most significant weights, as they were considered the most determining criteria for groundwater occurrence in the area. Compared to those above, criteria such as slope, texture and drainage density did not receive such high weights as in similar studies [15,17]. The calculated consistency ratio of less than 0.1 validated these considerations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…The AHP in this research used the most common construction parameters of GWPZ models, such as lithology, texture, slope and drainage density, according to the literature [15,17,19]. However, resistivity was also adopted as an intrinsic criterion since it strongly indicates groundwater presence [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this area, the slope positively correlated with runoff, indicating high runoff and fewer infiltration rates [53]. Due to the aforementioned, steeper slopes are unsuitable for groundwater occurrence and are classified with very low-low groundwater potential (Table 5) [2,115].…”
Section: Slopementioning
confidence: 95%