Delineating the Spatial Boundaries of Megaregions in China: A City Network Perspective

Abstract

Globalization and informatization have significantly reshaped the map of the global economy. Mega cities and regions have become the battlegrounds in the interplay between globalization and localization, with megaregions becoming the most globally significant spatial configurations in this regard. However, academics and government departments disagree on how to define the spatial boundaries of megaregions. In this study, on the basis of highway traffic flow data between cities, we integrate the community detection and core-periphery profile algorithms to characterize the city networks in China and identify the city groups and delineate the core structures of city groups, which are the underlying megaregional structures in China. Based on this, we identify 21 megaregions among city groups in China, including the Yangtze River Delta, Pearl River Delta, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, and Chengdu-Chongqing megaregions, and preliminarily delineate their spatial boundaries. On the whole, there are spatial differences among China’s megaregions to a certain extent. Central and eastern China have numerous, large, and a high density of megaregions, while the western region has relatively few megaregions. The latter also differs notably from mature megaregions in terms of rank sizes, urban systems, and functional divisions of labor. Generally, this study develops a novel analytical framework for identifying the functional regions of megaregional space in China from a perspective of relational geography, with methodological implications for other fields of inquiry.

Characterizing the Structural Evolution of Cereal Trade Networks in the Belt and Road Regions: A Network Analysis Approach

“…They align with research approaches that explore changes in the patterns and processes of geographical phenomena. Recently, network analysis tools have been used widely to explore the increasing connectivity of global food trade networks [12][13][14], with the study of agricultural trade networks as the most common research object. For instance, Cai and Song applied a complex network to analyze the relationship between agricultural and national trade and found that agricultural trade facilitates international commerce [15].…”

Assessing the structural connectivity of international trade networks along the “Belt and Road”

“…In complex networks, a community refers to a subset of a network. The nodes can be grouped into nodes that each community is closely connected to internally with sparser connections between groups, called community structure [24,25]. Modularity is one of the best-known quality measures for community detection [26].…”

Spatiotemporal Evolution and Market Dynamics of the International Liquefied Natural Gas Trade: A Multilevel Network Analysis

“…The concept of a core-periphery structure, which delineates a network into a dense core and a sparse periphery, has garnered significant attention and expanded beyond its original scope [40]. While various algorithms have been proposed for identifying core-periphery structures in networks, many of them lack the capability to handle weighted networks and require robustness validation.…”