Deliberative democracy and co-management of natural resources: The case of Funäsdalen snowmobile regulation area

Abstract

Abstract:Deliberation is an understudied aspect of co-management institutions and common pool theory that can be improved by a closer connection to deliberative democratic theory. Analyses of co-management arrangements provide needed empirical insights to deliberative democratic theory, although such arrangements are group-based and not readily accepted as examples of deliberative democracy. A framework is developed to analyze to what degree co-management arrangements incorporate deliberative elements and how they contribute to improved decision-making. To test its usefulness, a case study of a co-management process in Sweden is analyzed. In Funäsdalsfjällen, a mountainous area of western Sweden, a conflict-ridden situation caused by expanded use of snowmobiles eventually led to the establishment of a municipal regulation area. Central and regional authorities initially failed to resolve the conflict, but when the municipality started working directly with relevant interest groups, agreement was reached. Deliberative elements are shown to have been central to the success of the co-management process, and it is concluded that co-management and deliberative democratic approaches cross-fertilize one another.

Transforming conservation science and practice for a postnormal world

“…Deliberate methods are emerging in conservation to facilitate dialogue between researchers and decision makers, build capacity, and support learning (Zachrisson ; Lundmark & Matti ). Certain practices may be more effective than others in creating conditions for change, depending on context and end‐users (Newell ).…”

Legitimacy in Co‐Management: The Impact of Preexisting Structures, Social Networks and Governance Strategies

“…This notion draws on ideas from deliberative democracy (cf. Bäckstrand et al, 2010;Elster, 1998;Dryzek, 2000;Parkins and Mitchell, 2005;Zachrisson, 2009) and considers co-management as an arena in which opposing interests, through stakeholder participation, can be articulated and deliberated on, fostering understandings, common agreements and, finally, acceptance. However, cross-boundary collaboration is challenging and can also serve to channel or even institutionalize conflicts, and promote 'dialogues of the deaf' and mistrust (cf.…”

On the commons of developed industrialized countries

“…In the same direction we find studies of "cultural commons" (Bertacchini et al 2012). Property rights to, and management of the radio spectrum has been studied as a form of commons (Berge and Kranakis 2011), and so have microbial commons (Dedeurwaerdere 2010), protection of nature (Zachrisson 2009;Lawrence, Molteno, and Butterworth 2009), the atmosphere (Paavola 2008), the oceans (Holt 1992), and other global commons (Buck 1998).…”