2005
DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748632992.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deleuze's Philosophical Lineage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deleuze’s lineage does indeed unfold through a rich array of encounters – scientific and artistic, as well as philosophical. This hallmark of Deleuze’s philosophy has led some commentators to describe his thought process as ‘one which unfolds internal to an examination of the thought of others’ (Jones and Roffe, 2009: 3). For Abrahamsson, however, the uptake of these distinct trajectories via Deleuze’s philosophy ‘is characterised by a lack of historical and geographical context’, which, he argues, has generated ‘a lacunae relating to the ethical and political consequences that come with translating vitalist thought into political thought’ (2013: 38).…”
Section: Why Deleuze Why Now?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deleuze’s lineage does indeed unfold through a rich array of encounters – scientific and artistic, as well as philosophical. This hallmark of Deleuze’s philosophy has led some commentators to describe his thought process as ‘one which unfolds internal to an examination of the thought of others’ (Jones and Roffe, 2009: 3). For Abrahamsson, however, the uptake of these distinct trajectories via Deleuze’s philosophy ‘is characterised by a lack of historical and geographical context’, which, he argues, has generated ‘a lacunae relating to the ethical and political consequences that come with translating vitalist thought into political thought’ (2013: 38).…”
Section: Why Deleuze Why Now?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A summary of other criticisms of Deleuse and Guattari's particular philosophical stance is given by by Smith and Protevi (2008). Their thought is in the tradition of Husserl and Bergson, though drawing from many antecedents ( Jones and Roffe, 2009), and has a close affinity with the ideas of Foucault and of Derrida (Marks, 1998;Patton, 1996;Smith and Protevi, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The book constructs a stunning array of concepts to redescribe political time ('the geology of morals'), political space ('smooth' and 'striated', 'territory', 'earth' and 'the Natal'), political bodies ('assemblages', 'rhizomes', 'bodies without organs', 'multiplicities', 'apparatuses of capture' and 'war machines') and political energy ('macro-and micropolitics'). On the one hand, the book displays Deleuze's apprenticeship in the history of philosophy, with concepts recast from Hume, Kant, Leibniz, Bergson, Nietzsche and others (Jones and Roffe 2009). On the other, Deleuze presents a singular vision that seems to accomplish the mission he assigned transcendental philosophy in Difference and Repetition: to explore the upper and lower reaches of this world, that is, the mysterious factors that influence politics but that elude traditional categories of political science (Deleuze 1994: 135).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%