2022
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants
Lauren Young,
Sam J Oddie,
William McGuire
Abstract: Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants (Review)
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
44
12
10
2
Citation Types
2
60
0
0
Year Published
Range
2015
20152026
2026Publication Types
Select...
55
2
Relationship
0
57
Authors
Journals
Cited by 58 publications
(62 citation statements)
References 75 publications
2
60
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Furthermore, our findings are consistent with the results of a recent meta-analysis of 1551 very lowbirth-weight infants, which found that delaying the introduction of progressive enteral feeds beyond four days after birth may not reduce the risk of NEC or death [16]. We also could not detect a significant difference in NEC development or death before the discharge between an extended MEF at > 72 h and early progressive feeding.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Furthermore, our findings are consistent with the results of a recent meta-analysis of 1551 very lowbirth-weight infants, which found that delaying the introduction of progressive enteral feeds beyond four days after birth may not reduce the risk of NEC or death [16]. We also could not detect a significant difference in NEC development or death before the discharge between an extended MEF at > 72 h and early progressive feeding.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Thus, we anticipated that a sample size of 3142 patients (786 infants exposed to early achievement of full enteral feeding and 2356 infants unexposed) would have a 90% power to detect a 6% absolute risk reduction in culture-proven sepsis or death at a P < .05 significance level. This estimated risk reduction falls within the range reported in meta-analyses of clinical trials on early feeding practices (2%-10%) and in observational studies from developed countries (6%-10%) …”
Section: Methods
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Although we could not characterize the specific strategies applied in each NICU to favor the early establishment of full enteral feeding, these findings are broadly consistent with results from meta-analyses summarizing the effects of earlier and more rapid advancement of enteral feeding volumes . The meta-analysis on early progression of enteral feeding that included EPT infants along with very preterm infants (28-32 weeks of gestation) demonstrated that early achievement of full enteral feeding reduced the risk of severe infection (22% vs 31%; RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.87; n = 872; P = .001), the use of parenteral nutrition, and the length of hospital stay .…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…An increasing body of evidence has highlighted the advantages of early achievement of full enteral feeding. Notably, contrary to longstanding concerns, early enteral feeding with human milk has not been associated with a higher risk of NEC in meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials of daily advancement of enteral feeding volumes before or on postnatal day 4 (early progression of enteral feeding) and rapid advancement of enteral feeding volumes by 30 to 40 mL/kg/d (faster progression of enteral feeding) …”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 77%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…A comprehensive systematic review recently concluded that the effects of early progression of feeding on long-term growth or neurodevelopment are unknown [8]. Our findings provide low- to moderate-quality evidence that early feeding progression does not increase the risk of adverse long-term outcomes.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 63%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Furthermore, our findings are consistent with the results of a recent meta-analysis of 1551 very lowbirth-weight infants, which found that delaying the introduction of progressive enteral feeds beyond four days after birth may not reduce the risk of NEC or death [16]. We also could not detect a significant difference in NEC development or death before the discharge between an extended MEF at > 72 h and early progressive feeding.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Thus, we anticipated that a sample size of 3142 patients (786 infants exposed to early achievement of full enteral feeding and 2356 infants unexposed) would have a 90% power to detect a 6% absolute risk reduction in culture-proven sepsis or death at a P < .05 significance level. This estimated risk reduction falls within the range reported in meta-analyses of clinical trials on early feeding practices (2%-10%) and in observational studies from developed countries (6%-10%) …”
Section: Methods
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Although we could not characterize the specific strategies applied in each NICU to favor the early establishment of full enteral feeding, these findings are broadly consistent with results from meta-analyses summarizing the effects of earlier and more rapid advancement of enteral feeding volumes . The meta-analysis on early progression of enteral feeding that included EPT infants along with very preterm infants (28-32 weeks of gestation) demonstrated that early achievement of full enteral feeding reduced the risk of severe infection (22% vs 31%; RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.87; n = 872; P = .001), the use of parenteral nutrition, and the length of hospital stay .…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…An increasing body of evidence has highlighted the advantages of early achievement of full enteral feeding. Notably, contrary to longstanding concerns, early enteral feeding with human milk has not been associated with a higher risk of NEC in meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials of daily advancement of enteral feeding volumes before or on postnatal day 4 (early progression of enteral feeding) and rapid advancement of enteral feeding volumes by 30 to 40 mL/kg/d (faster progression of enteral feeding) …”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 77%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…A comprehensive systematic review recently concluded that the effects of early progression of feeding on long-term growth or neurodevelopment are unknown [8]. Our findings provide low- to moderate-quality evidence that early feeding progression does not increase the risk of adverse long-term outcomes.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 63%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Furthermore, our findings are consistent with the results of a recent meta-analysis of 1551 very lowbirth-weight infants, which found that delaying the introduction of progressive enteral feeds beyond four days after birth may not reduce the risk of NEC or death [16]. We also could not detect a significant difference in NEC development or death before the discharge between an extended MEF at > 72 h and early progressive feeding.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Thus, we anticipated that a sample size of 3142 patients (786 infants exposed to early achievement of full enteral feeding and 2356 infants unexposed) would have a 90% power to detect a 6% absolute risk reduction in culture-proven sepsis or death at a P < .05 significance level. This estimated risk reduction falls within the range reported in meta-analyses of clinical trials on early feeding practices (2%-10%) and in observational studies from developed countries (6%-10%) …”
Section: Methods
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Although we could not characterize the specific strategies applied in each NICU to favor the early establishment of full enteral feeding, these findings are broadly consistent with results from meta-analyses summarizing the effects of earlier and more rapid advancement of enteral feeding volumes . The meta-analysis on early progression of enteral feeding that included EPT infants along with very preterm infants (28-32 weeks of gestation) demonstrated that early achievement of full enteral feeding reduced the risk of severe infection (22% vs 31%; RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.87; n = 872; P = .001), the use of parenteral nutrition, and the length of hospital stay .…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…An increasing body of evidence has highlighted the advantages of early achievement of full enteral feeding. Notably, contrary to longstanding concerns, early enteral feeding with human milk has not been associated with a higher risk of NEC in meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials of daily advancement of enteral feeding volumes before or on postnatal day 4 (early progression of enteral feeding) and rapid advancement of enteral feeding volumes by 30 to 40 mL/kg/d (faster progression of enteral feeding) …”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 77%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…A comprehensive systematic review recently concluded that the effects of early progression of feeding on long-term growth or neurodevelopment are unknown [8]. Our findings provide low- to moderate-quality evidence that early feeding progression does not increase the risk of adverse long-term outcomes.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 63%