2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delayed Fracture of a Ceramic Insert With Modern Ceramic Total Hip Replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
3
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
38
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Extensive metallosis was observed, compromising the bone bed due to both dissemination of hard ceramic fragments and direct wear of the metallic shell. In the Min et al 12 report, the degree of damage to the ceramic inlay, shown in Figure 5 of their paper, was mild in comparison to that observed in our study. Earlier surgery would undoubtedly have diminished metallosis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Extensive metallosis was observed, compromising the bone bed due to both dissemination of hard ceramic fragments and direct wear of the metallic shell. In the Min et al 12 report, the degree of damage to the ceramic inlay, shown in Figure 5 of their paper, was mild in comparison to that observed in our study. Earlier surgery would undoubtedly have diminished metallosis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The fracture was probably caused by neck-rim 344 J. Gallo, T. Stewart, R. Novotny, J. Dusza, D. Galusek impingement due to extreme hip motions related to the daily activities of Asian people, who frequently squat or sit cross-legged. Evidence of contact between the femoral neck and acetabular rim was reported as a common feature on retrieved acetabular liners 12,13 . Although such extreme hip-joint motion is not likely in our case, stem-rim impingement cannot be completely excluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although mechanistic information regarding fracture of ceramic liners is currently minimal, component impingement is believed to be a/the principal risk factor [14,17,23,28,36]. Component malpositioning [13], microseparation leading to edge loading [33], incomplete seating of modular liners [22], and obesity [30] have also been suggested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, this complication is devastating and still occurs. (Min 2007) Even with proof testing, it is unlikely that failure by fracture will be eliminated. Although theoretically proof testing eliminates weaker components, flawed products that are likely to fail are not always eliminated.…”
Section: Ceramic Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%