1961
DOI: 10.1037/h0039842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delay of gratification, need for achievement, and acquiescence in another culture.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
1

Year Published

1964
1964
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They develop high self-control competences such as resistance to temptations which would thwart goal attainment. For example, individuals with a high achievement motive have a high ability and willingness to delay gratification (Mischel 1961), which is an important component of self-control (Mischel 1973(Mischel , 1996. Delay of gratification is defined as the competence ''to defer immediate gratification for the sake of later but more valued outcomes'' (Mischel and Gilligan 1964, p. 411).…”
Section: Implicit Achievement Motive As Moderatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They develop high self-control competences such as resistance to temptations which would thwart goal attainment. For example, individuals with a high achievement motive have a high ability and willingness to delay gratification (Mischel 1961), which is an important component of self-control (Mischel 1973(Mischel , 1996. Delay of gratification is defined as the competence ''to defer immediate gratification for the sake of later but more valued outcomes'' (Mischel and Gilligan 1964, p. 411).…”
Section: Implicit Achievement Motive As Moderatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately three decades ago, social cognitive researchers 2 began to study various components of self-regulation such as response inhibition (e.g., Walters et al, 1963;Walters and Parke, 1964), adoption of selfregulatory standards (e.g., Bandura et al, 1967;B andura and Kupers, 1964;Mischel and Liebert, 1966), delay of gratification (Mischel, 1961;Bandura and Mischel, 1965), and rule induction and use (e.g., Bandura and Harris, 1966;Bandura and McDonald, 1963). This research has led to the development of a unique triadic view of human self-regulation, involving personal, behavioral, and environmental dimensions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes the items are reversed on the second administration so that "yes-yes" or "no-no" responses are inconsistent (Peabody, 1961(Peabody, , 1964Rorer & Goldberg, 1964); sometimes items presumed to measure the same trait in opposite directions are administered simultaneously and scored for consistency (Christie, Havel, & Seidenburg, 1958). Sometimes syllogisms are broken down into triads of items so that subjects can be scored for the tendency to agree with the premises and disagree with the conclusion (Ca+,tell et al, 1955 Kuethe, 1960;Mahler, 1962;Mischel, 1961;Moore, 1964).…”
Section: Acquiescencementioning
confidence: 99%