2022
DOI: 10.3390/electronics11060839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delay and Energy-Efficiency-Balanced Task Offloading for Electric Internet of Things

Abstract: With the development of the smart grid, massive electric Internet of Things (EIoT) devices are deployed to collect data and offload them to edge servers for processing. However, the task of offloading optimization still faces several challenges, such as the differentiated quality of service (QoS) requirements, decision coupling among multiple devices, and the impact of electromagnetic interference. In this paper, a low-complexity delay and energy-efficiency-balanced task offloading algorithm based on many-to-o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [40], the authors proposed an offloading algorithm for Energy IoT (EIoT) devices in smart grids. The algorithm aims to achieve energy efficiency without violating the delay constraints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [40], the authors proposed an offloading algorithm for Energy IoT (EIoT) devices in smart grids. The algorithm aims to achieve energy efficiency without violating the delay constraints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second offloading was introduced as a dynamic solution that allowed fog nodes to exit the overloading state by redirecting a portion of the workload to other fog nodes. To propose an efficient offloading service, four main questions should be answered: How is the offloading node chosen [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47], how is the number of offloading nodes decided [37], what tasks are eligible for offloading [35] and how is the number of offloaded tasks determined [38]. The proposed dynamic offloading service attempts to address these questions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [18], edge resources were allocated to minimize average latency while numerous IoT systems powered multiple smart city facilities and met the edge server capacity limits. Another article [19] proposed an algorithm for offloading tasks with low complexity and balancing energy efficiency based on two-sided correspondence in an IoT system; the suggested method is innovative in dynamically balancing energy efficiency and delay and stably offloading tasks with low complexity.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small-Timescale Second-Stage Channel Selection: In each slot, m i , ∀m i ∈ Θ makes action decision based on (18) and selects the corresponding channel. Then, m i calculates the r i,n ðtÞ and r i,n ðtÞ based on ( 14) and (15). Finally, update r K ðt + 1Þ and ε t+1 based on ( 16) and (17).…”
Section: Wireless Communications and Mobile Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matching theory provides an effective approach to solve the two-side matching problem by defining the preferences of matching subjects to address access conflicts among devices, which has been widely used in solving task offloading problems [14,15]. In [16], Shi et al proposed a two-side matching-based server selection algorithm to maximize the efficiency of device-to-device content sharing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%