2022
DOI: 10.3390/info13070328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Edge Computing for Resource Allocation in Smart Cities Based on the IoT

Abstract: Smart cities using the Internet of Things (IoT) can operate various IoT systems with better services that provide intelligent and efficient solutions for various aspects of urban life. With the rapidly growing number of IoT systems, the many smart city services, and their various quality of service (QoS) constraints, servers face the challenge of allocating limited resources across all Internet-based applications to achieve an efficient per-formance. The presence of a cloud in the IoT system of a smart city re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal of resource management in MEC is to minimise system latency [7], energy consumption [8], and overall method latency and/or energy consumption costs [9]. In [10], the tradeoff problem is examined for computing networks with fog node cooperation with goal of reducing fog node reaction time within a specified power efficiency restriction.In order to reduce computation delay while maintaining a low overall computation energy consumption, work [11] studied joint service caching as well as task offloading problem in dense network.With goal of reducing the overall job duration while adhering to energy budget restrictions, author [12] looked into the MEC task offloading issue in software-described ultra-dense network.For minimising system latency of all mobile devices, author in [13] developed a joint communication as well as computation RAissue under collaboration of CC and EC.In order to investigate energy-delay tradeoff dilemma in a MECCmethod, work [14] developed a multiuser evaluation offloading game.In order to reduce total energy cost as well as less delay among all users, author [15] jointly optimised the offloading decisions of all users as well as resource allocation (RA).To reduce overhead of local energy consumption as well as simulation time costs, work [16] presented a distributed joint computation offloading as well as RA optimization strategy in heterogeneous networks with MEC. Particularly, case where number of MUs enhances explosively or network facilities are sparsely dispersed does not apply to the existing MEC approaches [17].Authors in [18] have been summarized journey of ML in the last thirty years and roles for the next generation wireless network as road for best optimization technique.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of resource management in MEC is to minimise system latency [7], energy consumption [8], and overall method latency and/or energy consumption costs [9]. In [10], the tradeoff problem is examined for computing networks with fog node cooperation with goal of reducing fog node reaction time within a specified power efficiency restriction.In order to reduce computation delay while maintaining a low overall computation energy consumption, work [11] studied joint service caching as well as task offloading problem in dense network.With goal of reducing the overall job duration while adhering to energy budget restrictions, author [12] looked into the MEC task offloading issue in software-described ultra-dense network.For minimising system latency of all mobile devices, author in [13] developed a joint communication as well as computation RAissue under collaboration of CC and EC.In order to investigate energy-delay tradeoff dilemma in a MECCmethod, work [14] developed a multiuser evaluation offloading game.In order to reduce total energy cost as well as less delay among all users, author [15] jointly optimised the offloading decisions of all users as well as resource allocation (RA).To reduce overhead of local energy consumption as well as simulation time costs, work [16] presented a distributed joint computation offloading as well as RA optimization strategy in heterogeneous networks with MEC. Particularly, case where number of MUs enhances explosively or network facilities are sparsely dispersed does not apply to the existing MEC approaches [17].Authors in [18] have been summarized journey of ML in the last thirty years and roles for the next generation wireless network as road for best optimization technique.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider that there exist n IoT devices and several delay-sensitive processes at UAV or IoT or cloud levels should be locally tackled [18]. 𝑈 𝑖 task generated in an IoT scheme (𝐷 𝑖 ), whereas 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑛, has the subsequent features: task size (𝑈 𝑠𝑧𝑖 ), (𝐸 𝑖,𝑙 ) energy consumed or CPU cycle, computation capability f 𝑖 ) concerning deadline (𝑑𝑙 𝑖 )and CPU cycles or seconds.…”
Section: Proposed Resource Scheduling Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…report a DEL examination of the LAARSS-DI and existing techniques under varying tasks[18,19]. The results inferred that the LAARSS-DI system has achieved effectual results with minimal DEL values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, cloud computing can be considered as the most suitable platform that provides solutions for the existing smart city applications (e.g., smart healthcare, smart transport and street lighting, smart environmental monitoring, and smart waste management). Usually, in the smart city, various IoT devices such as driverless cars, mobiles, and surveillance devices are connected to the cloud to use their computing services, which puts a huge load on the cloud networks to meet all the requirements of the IoT applications [1]. This could lead to a poor user experience due to the delays in the execution of IoT applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could lead to a poor user experience due to the delays in the execution of IoT applications. As a result, cloud performance in the context of smart cities may suffer from different issues, such as service latency, load balancing, resource optimization, energy consumption, and cost optimization [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%