2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degradation relationships for the mechanical properties of corroded steel rebars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
92
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
92
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, adopting an the empirical coefficient α y = 0.0094, obtained by regression analysis, Equation 5is also plotted. The slope of the degradation trend model of the steel yield ratio is close to the analogous value observed in their experiments by Zhu et al (α y = 0.01) [29], and smaller than the value proposed by Imperatore et al (α y = 0.0151) [28].…”
Section: Empirical Relationship For the Yield Strength Of Corrosion-dsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, adopting an the empirical coefficient α y = 0.0094, obtained by regression analysis, Equation 5is also plotted. The slope of the degradation trend model of the steel yield ratio is close to the analogous value observed in their experiments by Zhu et al (α y = 0.01) [29], and smaller than the value proposed by Imperatore et al (α y = 0.0151) [28].…”
Section: Empirical Relationship For the Yield Strength Of Corrosion-dsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…where f y,c and f y are the yield strength of the corroded and un-corroded steel rebars respectively, and Q c = (A sv,c − A sv )/A sv is the average corrosion degree, A sv,c and A sv being the area of transversal reinforcement in the corroded and un-corroded configuration, respectively. Five campaigns (230 specimens) of tensile tests on artificially corroded steel rebars [24][25][26][27][28] were considered. Only the specimens tested by Zhang et al [25] were obtained from both the natural corrosion process and an accelerated corrosion process.…”
Section: Empirical Relationship For the Yield Strength Of Corrosion-dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally believed that the passive film of the rebar is formed on its surface, while the corrosion of the rebar also initiates from the surface and gradually extends into the matrix [11][12][13][14]. Thus, the surface state of the rebar significantly affects its passivation and anticorrosion performance, especially under the contamination of Cl − [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12), we can determine the six parameters of skeleton curve of corroded compression-bending members. e difference of skeleton curve of the damaged and undamaged members is that they have the different the material parameters.…”
Section: Collapsing Shearing Force F Cud and Its Correspondingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, wind, waves, corrosive environment, and extreme temperatures all can impact the existing structures. During the entire service life of the RC structure, the continuous penetration of harmful ions induces cracking and spalling of the concrete cover [1][2][3], degradation of the bond strength [4][5][6][7], and decrease of the material strength [8][9][10][11][12]. In seismic-prone regions, the corrosion damage of the structures would reduce their lateral load-resisting capacity in a seismic event significantly [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%