2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2020.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degradation prognosis for proton exchange membrane fuel cell based on hybrid transfer learning and intercell differences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LSTM gives prediction accuracy of 99.23%. In another work (Ma et al, 2020), a hybrid method containing the LSTM algorithm is used for RUL prediction. The voltage curves of five cells from the PEMFC aging experiment provided by (Morando et al, 2017) are applied to train the LSTM model.…”
Section: Application Of Machine Learning For Fuel Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LSTM gives prediction accuracy of 99.23%. In another work (Ma et al, 2020), a hybrid method containing the LSTM algorithm is used for RUL prediction. The voltage curves of five cells from the PEMFC aging experiment provided by (Morando et al, 2017) are applied to train the LSTM model.…”
Section: Application Of Machine Learning For Fuel Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, three types of PEMFC prognostic strategies [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] have been proposed: model-based, data-based, and hybrid methods based on model and data fusion. Among them, the model-based strategy describes the degradation processes by constructing a physical model [6][7][8], which is beneficial to the prediction accuracy in the condition that the physical degradation model is sufficiently accurate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among recently published papers dealing with DL in the field of performance evaluation of PEMFCs including prognosis (i.e., RUL prediction), learning techniques, which have been derived from leading supervised learning tools such as convolutional neural networks (CNN) [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ], long short-term memory (LSTM) [ 14 , 15 , 16 ], deep belief neural networks (DBNs), and autoencoders (AEs) [ 17 , 18 ] have been extensively investigated. CNNs are generally recommended when trying to separate between different data patterns and make sure they offer a quite enhanced representation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%