Abstract:Plastic waste is an issue of global concern because of the environmental impact of its accumulation in waste management systems and ecosystems. Biodegradability was proposed as a solution to overcome this problem; however, most biodegradable plastics were designed to degrade under aerobic conditions, ideally fulfilled in a composting plant. These new plastics could arrive to anaerobic environments, purposely or frequently, because of their mismanagement at the end of their useful life. This review analyzes the… Show more
“…Incinerating is not a desirable mode for fossil-based biodegradable plastics, as it consumes a high amount of energy and emits greenhouse gases (Razza et al, 2015;Folino et al, 2020a). Also, some biodegradable products may not have completed their life cycle when landfilled (Shin et al, 1997;Quecholac-Piña et al, 2020).…”
Section: The Third Gap: Misconceptions and Truths On The Environmentamentioning
In the wake of plastic pollution increasing around the world, biodegradable plastics are one of the fastest-growing segments within the global plastics market. The biodegradation of these plastics depends on diverse factors including, but not limited to, the physicochemical structure of the materials, environmental conditions, and the microbial populations involved in the biodegradation. Although laboratory-based biodegradation tests simulate natural processes, they cannot precisely mimic the natural biodegradation of biodegradable plastics due to the disparity of several factors. In addition, the biodegradation levels claimed and/or reported by individuals and studies in different environments vary to a great extent. Biodegradable plastics are considered a sustainable alternative to non-biodegradable conventional plastics and are being promoted as an eco-friendlier choice for consumers. However, biodegradable plastics might not be as biodegradable as commonly believed, particularly in natural environments. This mini-review aims to bridge the following three gaps in biodegradable plastics by elucidating the common misconceptions and truths about biodegradation: i) the gaps among reported biodegradation level of biodegradable plastics; ii) the gaps between the biodegradation conditions in the controlled laboratory system and in the natural environment; and iii) the gaps between public perception and the actual environmental fate of biodegradable products. These gaps are critically reviewed with feasible solutions. This work will ease the assessment of biodegradable plastics and provide sound communication on corresponding claims–a prerequisite for successful market performance.
“…Incinerating is not a desirable mode for fossil-based biodegradable plastics, as it consumes a high amount of energy and emits greenhouse gases (Razza et al, 2015;Folino et al, 2020a). Also, some biodegradable products may not have completed their life cycle when landfilled (Shin et al, 1997;Quecholac-Piña et al, 2020).…”
Section: The Third Gap: Misconceptions and Truths On The Environmentamentioning
In the wake of plastic pollution increasing around the world, biodegradable plastics are one of the fastest-growing segments within the global plastics market. The biodegradation of these plastics depends on diverse factors including, but not limited to, the physicochemical structure of the materials, environmental conditions, and the microbial populations involved in the biodegradation. Although laboratory-based biodegradation tests simulate natural processes, they cannot precisely mimic the natural biodegradation of biodegradable plastics due to the disparity of several factors. In addition, the biodegradation levels claimed and/or reported by individuals and studies in different environments vary to a great extent. Biodegradable plastics are considered a sustainable alternative to non-biodegradable conventional plastics and are being promoted as an eco-friendlier choice for consumers. However, biodegradable plastics might not be as biodegradable as commonly believed, particularly in natural environments. This mini-review aims to bridge the following three gaps in biodegradable plastics by elucidating the common misconceptions and truths about biodegradation: i) the gaps among reported biodegradation level of biodegradable plastics; ii) the gaps between the biodegradation conditions in the controlled laboratory system and in the natural environment; and iii) the gaps between public perception and the actual environmental fate of biodegradable products. These gaps are critically reviewed with feasible solutions. This work will ease the assessment of biodegradable plastics and provide sound communication on corresponding claims–a prerequisite for successful market performance.
“…Composting expands the end-of-life options available for bioplastics and is particularly beneficial when mechanical recycling is not an option (31). However, composting requires existing infrastructure and collection systems and access to these varies based on locale (82).…”
Section: Solid Waste Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large fraction of plastic waste is disposed of in landfills. Despite landfills being a likely site of disposal, very little characterization of the biodegradation of biodegradable plastics in landfills has taken place (82). Very few plastics are recycled due to low consumer compliance, lack of infrastructure, and contamination of recycling streams (3).…”
Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) are a family of microbially-made polyesters that have been commercialized as biodegradable plastics. PHA production rates are predicted to increase rapidly as global concerns around environmental plastic contamination and limited fossil fuel resources have increased the importance of bio-based plastic alternatives. PHAs are meant to quickly degrade in the environment, but this degradation is reliant on microbially-secreted PHA depolymerases, whose taxonomic and environmental distribution have not been well-defined. As a result, the impact of increased PHA production and disposal on global environments is unknown. Here we used 3,842 metagenomes to analyze the distribution of PHA depolymerase genes in microbial communities from diverse aquatic, terrestrial and waste management systems. Our results indicate that extracellular PHA depolymerases are globally widespread but unevenly distributed, with certain environments showing little to no evidence for this activity. In tandem, we screened 5,290 metagenome-assembled genomes to describe the phylogenetic distribution of this trait, which is substantially broader compared to current cultured representatives. We identified members of the Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes as key lineages with PHA biodegradation potential and predict this activity in members of the Actinobacteria, the Candidate phylum Rokubacteria, Firmicutes, Planctomycetes and Spirochaetes.ImportanceEnvironmental concerns alongside legislation banning single-use petroleum-based plastics are expected to promote the production of bio-based plastics, including PHAs. PHAs represent a novel and emerging waste stream. If PHA disposal follows the precedent set by conventional plastics, a significant portion will be littered into the environment, or improperly discarded into landfills instead of composting facilities. Traditionally, the identification of bioplastic degrading enzymes and organisms has relied on culture-dependent assays. As a result, the PHA degradation capabilities of the “unculturable” fraction of microorganisms remain largely unexplored. Here, we leverage large amounts of environmental sequence data to assess which environments harbor PHA-degrading organisms and to determine the taxonomic affiliations of bioplastic degraders. Our analyses inform our understanding of the biodegradation potential in the environment, with implications for the impact of bioplastic pollution. We identify enzymes and organisms that may be suitable for future bioremediation, chemical processing or biotechnological applications.
“…Medicine [ 3 , 4 ] and packaging industry [ 5 ] are some of the numerous industries where various plastics are in demand. At the same time, the problem of environmental pollution is aggravated every year, including the consumption of these materials [ 6 ], therefore, the direction of biodegradable polymers is actively developing—polymers, capable of rapid biodegradation under the influence of environmental factors and microorganisms and having properties similar to traditional polymers [ 7 ].…”
Particular attention is paid to biodegradable materials from the environmental point of view and antimicrobial materials that ensure the microbiological safety of packaged products. The aim of the work was to study the properties of the composition, based on biodegradable polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT) and the antimicrobial additive—birch bark extract (BBE). Test samples of materials were obtained on the laboratory extruder by extrusion with ultrasonic treatment of the melt. The concentration of the antimicrobial additive in the polymer matrix was 1 wt %. A complex research was carried out to study the structural, physico–mechanical characteristics, antimicrobial properties and biodegradability of the modified PBAT. Comparative assessment of the physico–mechanical characteristics of samples based on PBAT showed that the strength and elongation at break indices slightly decrease when the ultrasonic treatment of the melt is introduced. It was found out, that the antimicrobial additive in the composition of the polymer matrix at the concentration of 1 wt % has a static effect on the development of microorganisms on the surface of the studied modified films. Studies of the biodegradability of modified PBAT by composting for 4 months have shown that the decomposition period of modified materials increased, compared to pure PBAT. The developed modified polymer material can be recommended as an alternative replacement for materials based on polyethylene for food packaging.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.