2018
DOI: 10.1364/ao.57.010348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degeneracy in freeform surfaces described with orthogonal polynomials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The constraints for controlling the system distortion, eliminating light obscuration and constraining system size can be established using real ray trace data. The sag difference between the freeform surface and base sphere should be controlled, in order to improve the manufacturability and testability of freeform surface 17 .…”
Section: Design Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The constraints for controlling the system distortion, eliminating light obscuration and constraining system size can be established using real ray trace data. The sag difference between the freeform surface and base sphere should be controlled, in order to improve the manufacturability and testability of freeform surface 17 .…”
Section: Design Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Zernike polynomial surface, the overall sag difference can be controlled by constraining the average sag difference along the edge of the circumcircle of the surface aperture to be zero. This can be done by controlling the surface coefficients of the rotationally symmetric terms directly 17 . For Q-type polynomials, the average sag difference along the edge of the circumcircle of the surface aperture is naturally zero if proper normalizing radius is set.…”
Section: Design Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For orthogonal polynomial departures (e.g., Zernike polynomials), while restrictions on the coefficients can be found by calculating derivatives, designers may find it easier to make restrictions by inspecting the representations of these polynomials. For example, only four of the first 36 Fringe Zernike terms will contribute to local x-astigmatism at the origin (Z5, Z12, Z21, and Z32 in Fringe ordering, or Z 2 ñ for ñ = 0, ..., 3 using the two-index notation 12,13 ), so the requirement can be written as…”
Section: Conical Optics Strict Vs Approximate Confocality and Freefor...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In surface representation, Zernike polynomials have emerged as a means of describing the shape of freeform optical surfaces [127][128][129][130][131]. State-of-the-art lens design programs, such as Zemax and CODE V, empower optical designers to use Zernike polynomials to represent freeform surfaces, which are called Zernike surfaces.…”
Section: Optical Designmentioning
confidence: 99%