1984
DOI: 10.1017/s001675680002923x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformational behaviour of migmatites and problems of structural analysis in migmatite terrains

Abstract: An understanding of the response of migmatites to deformation is crucial to an interpretation of their structures, and in anatectic and intrusive migmatite terrains due consideration must be given to the modification of deformation processes imposed by melts. In partially molten systems containing more than 30% melt the classical theories of fold formation are inapplicable; the folds produced are of the ‘viscous fold’ type. Their geometry is unpredictable and may mimic structures due to refolding; this is part… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
2

Year Published

1985
1985
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(30 reference statements)
2
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2), indicates that the belt of metasediments has maintained its structural coherency during anatexis. Viscous folding in rocks with greater than 30~01% partial melting, as described by McLellan (1984), resulting in scattering of structural element orientations, has not occurred to any great extent.…”
Section: Kilometre-scale Plutonic Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…2), indicates that the belt of metasediments has maintained its structural coherency during anatexis. Viscous folding in rocks with greater than 30~01% partial melting, as described by McLellan (1984), resulting in scattering of structural element orientations, has not occurred to any great extent.…”
Section: Kilometre-scale Plutonic Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, we are fortunate in having some easily available reviews on which to base a revised opinion (King, 1965;McLellan, 1984;Ashworth, 1985;Olsen, 1985;and Brown, 1993). The origin of migmatites is not so easily solved as was once thought.…”
Section: Preamblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous structural studies of migmatites have used classic field methods, melt topology analysis or fabric analysis. Field studies have highlighted the complex geometric relationships between leucosome, mesosome, and melanosome [e.g., McLellan , 1983; Passchier et al , 1990; Hopgood , 1998]. Melt topology analysis has provided a better understanding of the leucosome distribution with respect to the principal strain axes [ Brown et al , 1999; Vernon and Paterson , 2001; Barraud et al , 2001].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%