2006
DOI: 10.1243/095441105x69105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation of press-fitted metallic resurfacing cups. Part 2: Finite element simulation

Abstract: The deformation of metallic acetabular cups employed for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing procedures was considered theoretically using the finite element method in the present study, following on the experimental investigation reported in Part 1. Three representative cups, characterized by the cup wall thickness as thin, intermediate, and thick, were considered. For the intermediate cup, the effects of both the size and the diametral interference on the cup deformation were investigated. Both two-dimensional ax… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
52
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(5 reference statements)
2
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the minimum size of the femoral component is defined by the femoral neck diameter; otherwise notching will occur, resulting in an increased risk for femoral neck fractures, a major cause of failure in HRA [4,6,14,20]. Therefore, considering the large femoral components and minimum wall diameter of the acetabular cups necessary to provide sufficient internal rigidity [24], additional bone resection on the acetabular side might be the result of femoral bone preservation [12]. This assumption was affirmed by Loughead et al [13] and by our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the minimum size of the femoral component is defined by the femoral neck diameter; otherwise notching will occur, resulting in an increased risk for femoral neck fractures, a major cause of failure in HRA [4,6,14,20]. Therefore, considering the large femoral components and minimum wall diameter of the acetabular cups necessary to provide sufficient internal rigidity [24], additional bone resection on the acetabular side might be the result of femoral bone preservation [12]. This assumption was affirmed by Loughead et al [13] and by our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AC deformation after insertion should be minimized in order to allow proper insertion of the liner in the AC [11,12]. The cup deformation was examined by changing implant designs or interference levels using static implicit loads [13] or explicit dynamics model [14] to simulate the implant impaction. The cup deformation was shown to increase with the level of interference fit [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cup deformation was examined by changing implant designs or interference levels using static implicit loads [13] or explicit dynamics model [14] to simulate the implant impaction. The cup deformation was shown to increase with the level of interference fit [13,14]. In order to promote biological fixation through bone ingrowth and to minimize the gap between bone and the implant surface, different studies have also focused on finding an optimal configuration for the implant seating while considering different implant geometry, interference fit and friction levels [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the local clearance at the pole of the Alpharabola hip implant is zero, a large equatorial clearance of (2  ) 1/2 R 2  R 2 can be formed for the horizontally positioned cup by the continuous and monotonous variation in the radius of the Alpharabola surface. Such a large equatorial clearance is advantageous to avoid the potential clamping and equatorial contact under loading (Farrar and Schmidt, 1997) and when implanted through press-fit Yew et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%