2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2012.01431.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation of dry and wet sandstone targets during hypervelocity impact experiments, as revealed from the MEMIN Program

Abstract: Abstract-Hypervelocity impact experiments on dry and water-saturated targets of fine-grained quartz sandstone, performed within the MEMIN project, have been investigated to determine the effects of porosity and pore space saturation on deformation mechanisms in the crater's subsurface. A dry sandstone cube and a 90% water-saturated sandstone cube (Seeberger Sandstein, 20 cm side length, about 23% porosity) were impacted at the Fraunhofer EMI acceleration facilities by 2.5 mm diameter steel spheres at 4.8 and 5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
86
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
5
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental cratering studies in Seeberger sandstone targets (~23% porosity, ~89% quartz, ~10% phyllosilicates), conducted on dry and wet samples, revealed a shift to finer grain sizes in the ejecta for wet samples (Buhl et al. ; Sommer et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental cratering studies in Seeberger sandstone targets (~23% porosity, ~89% quartz, ~10% phyllosilicates), conducted on dry and wet samples, revealed a shift to finer grain sizes in the ejecta for wet samples (Buhl et al. ; Sommer et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quartz grains are subrounded and cemented by quartz, phyllosilicates, and accessory phases (Buhl et al. , ). Uniaxial compression tests showed strength values of ~70 MPa for dry samples and ~57 MPa for wet samples (Poelchau et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Buhl et al. , ), and also to search for shatter cones and to constrain the formation conditions (Shoemaker et al. ; Moore et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could have been responsible for constant water saturation of the Ries area but temporary water table drawdown in the Steinheim area. A significant influence of water saturation or the temporary lack of groundwater in the target rocks on the rate of compaction of porous target rocks and suppression of impact ejecta can be assumed (e.g., Buhl et al, 2013) but we are not aware of any detailed crater-scale investigations on this effect. The degree of water-saturation in the target rocks of the Steinheim Basin and the influence of this parameter on the suppression of impact ejecta in our investigation unfortunately remains unclear.…”
Section: Absence Of Steinheim Ejecta Outside the Crater: Primary Effementioning
confidence: 99%