1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf00543690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation and fracture of an amorphous metallic alloy at high pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
39
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The M-C criterion, using an internal friction coefficient of a = 0.058 ± 0.012 and a cohesion of c = 1.026 ± 0.014 GPa, predicts the experimental strength envelope well at all range of normal stress. This value of a = 0.058 ± 0.012 is very consistent with other tests conducted with superimposed hydrostatic pressure [1,[3][4][5][6][7]. In contrast, predictions by the other criteria deviate apparently from experiments, in particularly when the normal stress approaches the compressive strength of Vitreloy 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The M-C criterion, using an internal friction coefficient of a = 0.058 ± 0.012 and a cohesion of c = 1.026 ± 0.014 GPa, predicts the experimental strength envelope well at all range of normal stress. This value of a = 0.058 ± 0.012 is very consistent with other tests conducted with superimposed hydrostatic pressure [1,[3][4][5][6][7]. In contrast, predictions by the other criteria deviate apparently from experiments, in particularly when the normal stress approaches the compressive strength of Vitreloy 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…(5) can fit most of the region, there is apparent deviation of the theory from experimental data, in particular as the normal stress approaches the compressive strength. The friction coefficient a = 0.058 ± 0.012 and cohesion c = 1.026 ± 0.014 GPa from M-C fitting agree well with literature reports for samples tested with superimposed hydrostatic pressure by Davis et al [1] and Lewandowski et al [3][4][5][6][7]. This confirms that the failure strength in Vitreloy 1 is only moderately normal stress/ pressure-dependent when failure occurs by shear.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here, relative sliding occurs along non-planar surfaces and hence does not preserve volume; yield is therefore pressure-sensitive in such materials. Granular media [1]-[2], polymers [3]- [5], metallic glasses [6]- [7] or fractured ceramics all have a yield stress that varies with the local hydrostatic stress. For isotropic granular media the simplest yield surface corresponds to the Drucker-Prager flow criterion, which traces, in principal stress space, a cone having again the bissectrix as its axis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%