2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of hydrostatic pressure on flow and deformation in highly reinforced particulate composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(59 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 5a and Figure 5b increasing deviation from the average as the volume fraction of voided inclusions increases (see Figure 5b). The observed sensitivity for the measurements of the transverse strain at large volume fraction of inclusions is consistent with an earlier study on highly loaded particulate composites [54]. Moreover, data in Figure 5b display a small departure from the HS curve (here not a bound) for c ≥ 0.4.…”
Section: Experimental Results For the Effective Young's Modulus And Psupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In Figure 5a and Figure 5b increasing deviation from the average as the volume fraction of voided inclusions increases (see Figure 5b). The observed sensitivity for the measurements of the transverse strain at large volume fraction of inclusions is consistent with an earlier study on highly loaded particulate composites [54]. Moreover, data in Figure 5b display a small departure from the HS curve (here not a bound) for c ≥ 0.4.…”
Section: Experimental Results For the Effective Young's Modulus And Psupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Among the fluoro-functionalized samples, the electropolished base surfaces exhibited the highest WCA followed by the ground series and the shot peened ones, respectively; these results are aligned with previous findings confirming the role of random microscale features (SP series) in promoting surface wettability. [17,34,35] It should also be considered that the magnitude of the surface roughness on the SP series was much higher compared to the G series (11.58 vs 0.59 in terms of R a for SP and G series, respectively). This remarkable roughness difference could have contributed to the distinctive WCA results between the SP-A-F-L/SP-B-F-L pair and G-A-F-L/G-B-F-L. Higher surface roughness within the same length scale could stimulate higher wettability.…”
Section: Surface Wettabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, cermets with high volume fractions of hard ceramic inclusions are more akin to a granular medium with a high cohesive strength rather than a typical particle-reinforced composite. For example, recent studies (Pickering et al, 2016;Tarantino et al, 2016) have demonstrated that the multi-axial yield response of cermets is not solely governed by the von-Mises stress. Rather, similar to granular materials, cermets dilate under compression and thus their strength is also dependent on the imposed hydrostatic pressure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%