2012
DOI: 10.5755/j01.mech.18.3.1877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation Analysis of Railgun Cross –Section

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This size of a numerical model for mechanical calculations can be solved more comfortable because the finite element size could be hundred times bigger than finite element size of EM numerical model. The finite element size influence for EM launcher construction behaviour was investigated in the paper (Gildutis et al 2012).…”
Section: Analysis Idea and Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This size of a numerical model for mechanical calculations can be solved more comfortable because the finite element size could be hundred times bigger than finite element size of EM numerical model. The finite element size influence for EM launcher construction behaviour was investigated in the paper (Gildutis et al 2012).…”
Section: Analysis Idea and Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding 3-D FE model was generated using tetrahedral elements. In the case of mechanical modelling, the field gradients distribute uniformly, and no special refinement is necessary (Gildutis et al 2012). In the EM model, the air ambient was necessary for magnetic field distribution calculations and in the mechanical model the air ambient is not necessary, and the bigger model can be built under lowest hardware resources.…”
Section: Finite Element Model Of the Mechanical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The element size corresponds to the minimal mesh density required to capture a 3-D behavior of the entire railgun structure at acceptable computational expenses. A similar size of elements was used in [11]. The finite element mesh that was used for calculations consists of 26 544 3-D hexahedral elements.…”
Section: Finite Element Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similar size of elements was used as described in paper [9]. Finally, the finite element mesh that was used for calculations consisted of 26544 3D hexahedral elements.…”
Section: The Finite Element Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%