2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-75381-8_36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation Analysis in Ultrasonic-Assisted Multi-stage Incremental Sheet Forming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiments are carried out through two kind of pressing processes to obtain the relationship between the pressing time and the compact density and the experimental results are compared with the simulation results, as shown in Figure 10. It can be seen from the figure that the experimental and simulated compact density errors are not large, and the errors in the forming process are both lower than 10%, indicating that the finite element simulation and experimental results are relatively consistent [23]. When the density is greater than 5 g/cm 3 , the error between the experimental value and the simulation value is greater than 6%, mainly because the finite element simulation regards the friction coefficient between the particles and between the particles and the mold as a fixed value during the particle forming process, while the friction coefficient between the particles and between the particles and the mold in the actual pressing process is a constantly changing process, especially the deformation and displacement of the particles in the middle and late pressing period are complicated.…”
Section: Experimental Verificationmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Experiments are carried out through two kind of pressing processes to obtain the relationship between the pressing time and the compact density and the experimental results are compared with the simulation results, as shown in Figure 10. It can be seen from the figure that the experimental and simulated compact density errors are not large, and the errors in the forming process are both lower than 10%, indicating that the finite element simulation and experimental results are relatively consistent [23]. When the density is greater than 5 g/cm 3 , the error between the experimental value and the simulation value is greater than 6%, mainly because the finite element simulation regards the friction coefficient between the particles and between the particles and the mold as a fixed value during the particle forming process, while the friction coefficient between the particles and between the particles and the mold in the actual pressing process is a constantly changing process, especially the deformation and displacement of the particles in the middle and late pressing period are complicated.…”
Section: Experimental Verificationmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Experiments were carried out using two kinds of pressing processes to obtain the relationship between the pressing time and the compact density, and the experimental results were compared with the simulation results when the amplitude of vibration was 3 μm, as shown in Figure 10 . It can be seen from the figure that the experimental and simulated compact density errors are not large, and the errors in the forming process are both lower than 10%, indicating that the finite element simulation and experimental results are relatively consistent [ 25 ]. When the density is greater than 5 g/cm 3 , the error between the experimental value and the simulation value is greater than 6%, mainly because the finite element simulation regards the friction coefficient between the particles and between the particles and the mold as a fixed value during the particle-forming process, while the friction coefficient between the particles and between the particles and the mold in the actual pressing process is a constantly changing process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [19] used a variety of forming strategies to create a frustum of cone with a 30° wall angle in order to investigate the effect of the number of forming stages (n) and the incremental wall angle between adjacent stages ( ) on the formability of ISF. Cheng et al [20] demonstrate the thickness distribution effect of ultrasonic vibration (UV). It is discovered that by introducing UV, the thickness distribution can be significantly improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%