2009
DOI: 10.1080/01900690902908760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Definitions and Typologies in Public Administration Research: The Case of Decentralization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The ongoing debate has focused on the questions of whether the funding and delivery of child benefits should be centralized or decentralized (Glennerster, 2009, Ferrera, 2005, McEwen and Moreno, 2005, Obinger et al, 2005, Pierson, 2001, Dubois and Fattore, 2009, Castles, 1999; whether they should vary by number and age of children, and family type (Bradshaw, 2006, Bradshaw, 2010, Bradshaw et al, 1993b, Bradshaw et al, 1993a, Bradshaw and Finch, 2002, Bradshaw et al, 2007, OECD, 2009); whether they should be universal or means/wealth-tested (Oorschot van, 2002, Pritchett, 2005, Gelbach and Pritchett, 1995, Moene and Wallerstein, 2001, Skocpol, 1991, Korpi and Palme, 1998.…”
Section: Literature On the Impact Of Public Policies On Child Povertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ongoing debate has focused on the questions of whether the funding and delivery of child benefits should be centralized or decentralized (Glennerster, 2009, Ferrera, 2005, McEwen and Moreno, 2005, Obinger et al, 2005, Pierson, 2001, Dubois and Fattore, 2009, Castles, 1999; whether they should vary by number and age of children, and family type (Bradshaw, 2006, Bradshaw, 2010, Bradshaw et al, 1993b, Bradshaw et al, 1993a, Bradshaw and Finch, 2002, Bradshaw et al, 2007, OECD, 2009); whether they should be universal or means/wealth-tested (Oorschot van, 2002, Pritchett, 2005, Gelbach and Pritchett, 1995, Moene and Wallerstein, 2001, Skocpol, 1991, Korpi and Palme, 1998.…”
Section: Literature On the Impact Of Public Policies On Child Povertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 There is, however, an emerging consensus that decentralisation broadly refers to the transfer of authority to manage, plan and make decisions, from the central government to agencies and actors at lower levels. 1,[7][8][9][10][11] Decentralisation, in its many forms, seeks to promote a more effective and efficient system aimed at rectifying a topdown bureaucratic structure and improving government responsiveness to the public. 4,8,10,12 Among its many promises, decentralisation aims to bring services closer to people, 8,10,13 improve access to services, 1,8 allow for community participation, 12,14 improve employee morale and turnover 15 and place particular emphasis on improving quality, access and equity, empowering local governments and increasing innovation and efficiency.…”
Section: Approaches To Decentralisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At an ontological level, the focus on practices and the relational perspective enters the structureagency debate by ascribing a greater role to agency as opposed to structures in analyses. For classical public administration theory, traditionally accustomed to categorizing, making frameworks and sketching other formal pathways and solutions, this focus poses the challenge of how to deal with these pluralistic, informal and contingent citizens' initiatives (Shafritz, 2015;Dubois et al, 2009;De Schutter and Lenoble, 2010).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%