Defining the representativeness heuristic in trauma triage: A retrospective observational cohort study

Abstract

BackgroundUnder-triage of severely injured patients presenting to non-trauma centers (failure to transfer to a trauma center) remains problematic despite quality improvement efforts. Insights from the behavioral science literature suggest that physician heuristics (intuitive judgments), and in particular the representativeness heuristic (pattern recognition), may contribute to under-triage. However, little is known about how the representativeness heuristic is instantiated in practice.MethodsA multi-disciplinary group of experts identified candidate characteristics of “representative” severe trauma cases (e.g., hypotension). We then reviewed the charts of patients with moderate-to-severe injuries who presented to nine non-trauma centers in western Pennsylvania from 2010–2014 to assess the association between the presence of those characteristics and triage decisions. We tested bivariate associations using χ2 and Fisher’s Exact method and multivariate associations using random effects logistic regression.ResultsWe identified 235,605 injured patients with 3,199 patients (1%) having moderate-to-severe injuries. Patients had a median age of 78 years (SD 20.1) and mean Injury Severity Score of 10.9 (SD 3.3). Only 759 of these patients (24%) were transferred to a trauma center as recommended by the American College of Surgeons clinical practice guidelines. Representative characteristics occurred in 704 patients (22%). The adjusted odds of transfer were higher in the presence of representative characteristics compared to when they were absent (aOR 1.7, 95% CI: 1.4–2.0, p < 0.001).ConclusionsMost moderate-to-severely injured patients present without the characteristics representative of severe trauma. Presence of these characteristics is associated with appropriate transfer, suggesting that modifying physicians’ heuristics in trauma may improve triage patterns.

Association of Practitioner Interfacility Triage Performance With Outcomes for Severely Injured Patients With Fee-for-Service Medicare Insurance

“…Patients that we identified as severely injured who were discharged from the ED may have been misclassified in our analysis. However, a study previously validated, 32 through medical record review, the observation that practitioners frequently discharge severely injured patients from the ED. We consequently speculated that these discharges offered an indirect method of assessing patient robustness.…”

Cognitive Biases and Shared Decision Making in Acute Brain Injury

“…49,50 Decision science directs that research to look for factors than can induce biases in heuristics that otherwise serve clinicians well. 51,52 People develop well-calibrated heuristics when they perform the same task repeatedly, guided by reliable rules, and informed by prompt feedback on their performance. Those conditions are often lacking when prognosticating outcomes for patients with SABI.…”

Does Preexisting Practice Modify How Video Games Recalibrate Physician Heuristics in Trauma Triage?

“…We have shown that physicians often rely on the representativeness heuristic (pattern recognition) when determining the disposition of injured patients. 9,15 Physicians using this heuristic are more likely to transfer representative trauma cases (gunshot wound to the torso) than nonrepresentative trauma cases (frail patient with a fall and at a high risk for complications) although both patients may be deemed severely injured and require transfer according to the American College of Surgeons' Committee on Trauma guidelines. 3,9 We designed two video game interventions to recalibrate this heuristic for triage decisions.…”