2016
DOI: 10.1080/14736489.2016.1165570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining the “queers” in India: The politics of academic representation

Abstract: International audienceIn the last 20 years, research and academic writing on “non-heterosexual” lives, identifications, and sexualities have developed considerably in India, in a context where lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) and queer politics have become more and more visible in the public sphere. When it comes to gender and sexuality, researchers are often activists, and scholarship is highly political. In particular, by documenting non-heterosexual lives, practices, and groups, social scienti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Certain campus spaces also appear instrumental in reshaping online and offline gender-based political identities: demanding safety (Dey 2018), challenging moral policing surrounding the public disclosure of romance and loitering (Kapur 2012;Murali 2016;Savory Fuller 2018) and empowering women to reclaim freedom of movement and access to public spaces at any time-for example by challenging a hostel curfew (Roy 2016) or accessing male-dominated tea shops (Poonam 2018). The sporadic emergence of young queer collectives in dialogue with several Women Studies Centers has enabled select campuses of prestigious Indian educational institutions to become platforms for the inceptive politicization of alternative sexualities (Dutoya 2016).…”
Section: Locating the Distinctiveness Of Politics In Campus Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain campus spaces also appear instrumental in reshaping online and offline gender-based political identities: demanding safety (Dey 2018), challenging moral policing surrounding the public disclosure of romance and loitering (Kapur 2012;Murali 2016;Savory Fuller 2018) and empowering women to reclaim freedom of movement and access to public spaces at any time-for example by challenging a hostel curfew (Roy 2016) or accessing male-dominated tea shops (Poonam 2018). The sporadic emergence of young queer collectives in dialogue with several Women Studies Centers has enabled select campuses of prestigious Indian educational institutions to become platforms for the inceptive politicization of alternative sexualities (Dutoya 2016).…”
Section: Locating the Distinctiveness Of Politics In Campus Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How LGBT+ people are represented to the state comes from many sources including social scientists, LGBT+ social movements and individuals, yet noted tensions exist in India among and within these bodies [ 16 ]. From a larger structural perspective, even when LGBT+ recognition is achieved in law, such as the Employment Equality Framework Directive (EED) in the EU, implementation is problematic, particularly in countries for which social services are substantially provided by religious organizations [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common term in essays and published material is samlaiṃgik, of the same sex. Dutoya (2016) gives a thorough discussion on the academic and activist discourse on queerness in the Indian context. 2 Consolaro 2011, 300-308;Consolaro 2014a.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%