1995
DOI: 10.1021/ja00108a036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining the Domain of Density Functionals: Charge-Transfer Complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
107
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
7
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Strongly bonded systems as well as weakly bonded ones, like hydrogen-bonded systems 5 or charge-transfer complexes, 6 are also described with reasonable accuracy. As the method is particularly cost-effective, it is now widely used as a standard alternative to conventional postHartree-Fock methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…4 Strongly bonded systems as well as weakly bonded ones, like hydrogen-bonded systems 5 or charge-transfer complexes, 6 are also described with reasonable accuracy. As the method is particularly cost-effective, it is now widely used as a standard alternative to conventional postHartree-Fock methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Though a previous study for related CTC's in gas phase 49 has shown the difficulties of DFT to reproduce experimental geometry, especially at the local level, no DFT result is available for the corresponding TS structures. Since the TS is much more polar than the CTC, the electrostatic interactions dominate and the influence of density gradient corrections on the geometry is expected to be smaller in that case.…”
Section: Definition Of the Reaction Coordinatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand it fails to reproduce nonlocal dispersive forces, in particular van der Waals forces, which are important in weakly bonded materials such as graphite, molecular crystals, and many organic compounds. [7][8][9] It is also well known that the local-density approximation ͑LDA͒ tends to overbind systems where van der Waals interactions are important, while the generalized gradient approximations ͑GGAs͒ usually tend to underestimate the binding in these systems. In the case of graphene on metals many GGAs, contrary to experiments, predict no binding at all, and therefore most theoretical work on graphene-metal interfaces has relied on the LDA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%