2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-19216-1_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining States in Reliability and Safety Modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was achieved by characterising connectivity reliability, defined as the probability that a network node remains connected, taking into account the interactions between the reliability of infrastructure systems and rolling stock subsystems in relation to the intensity of use. Franciszek [32] presented an approach to model the reliability of railway transport systems, concluding that for models with critical infrastructures, the unreliability of the system is contained in random streams of unwanted events. In these models, interference in the transportation process is taken into account only in the form of delays.…”
Section: Modelling Railway Infrastructure Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was achieved by characterising connectivity reliability, defined as the probability that a network node remains connected, taking into account the interactions between the reliability of infrastructure systems and rolling stock subsystems in relation to the intensity of use. Franciszek [32] presented an approach to model the reliability of railway transport systems, concluding that for models with critical infrastructures, the unreliability of the system is contained in random streams of unwanted events. In these models, interference in the transportation process is taken into account only in the form of delays.…”
Section: Modelling Railway Infrastructure Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%