2005 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology
DOI: 10.1109/icit.2005.1600861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defect Reconstruction from MFL Signals Using An Improved Genetic Local Search Algorithm

Abstract: This paper presents an improved GLSA (IGLSA) by incorporating the simulated annealing technique into the perturbation process of the genetic local search (GLSA), and proposes an IGLSA-based inverse algorithm for 2-D defect reconstruction from the magnetic flux leakage (MFL) signals. In the algorithm, radial-basis function neural network (RBFNN) is utilized as forward model, and the IGLSA is used to solve the optimization problem in the inverse problem. Experiments are presented to show the performance of the I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Defect depth changes respectively tank floor thickness (mm) of 20%, 40%, 60%, while ensuring the cylinder diameter is 10mm unchanged, through the finite element analysis, lists the forms of defects of different depth calculation results, are defects in different depth of the magnetic flux density distribution nephogram, magnetic flux density of the vertical component and the magnetic flux density of the horizontal component of the three magnetic flux leakage characteristic parameters were compared [6]. What were shown in the Figure 4 and Figure 5 are the horizontal component and the amplitude of the leakage magnetic field.…”
Section: Analysis Of Influencing Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defect depth changes respectively tank floor thickness (mm) of 20%, 40%, 60%, while ensuring the cylinder diameter is 10mm unchanged, through the finite element analysis, lists the forms of defects of different depth calculation results, are defects in different depth of the magnetic flux density distribution nephogram, magnetic flux density of the vertical component and the magnetic flux density of the horizontal component of the three magnetic flux leakage characteristic parameters were compared [6]. What were shown in the Figure 4 and Figure 5 are the horizontal component and the amplitude of the leakage magnetic field.…”
Section: Analysis Of Influencing Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%