1983
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2210760266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defect diffusion during ion implantation into GaAs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous papers [3,4] we have represented the optical properties of N+-implanted GaAs in dependence on the ion dose, the implantation temperature, and the depth. I n comparison with the results of Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS) it was shown that in ion-implanted GaAs two different types of radiation damage can be distinguished: (i) amorphous regions which are connected with a short absorption tail near the fundamental absorption edge and a refractive index change of the order of about 10 yo and (ii) high concentrations of point defects and/or agglomerations of them causing a long absorption tail near the fundamental absorption edge with almost no refractive index change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous papers [3,4] we have represented the optical properties of N+-implanted GaAs in dependence on the ion dose, the implantation temperature, and the depth. I n comparison with the results of Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS) it was shown that in ion-implanted GaAs two different types of radiation damage can be distinguished: (i) amorphous regions which are connected with a short absorption tail near the fundamental absorption edge and a refractive index change of the order of about 10 yo and (ii) high concentrations of point defects and/or agglomerations of them causing a long absorption tail near the fundamental absorption edge with almost no refractive index change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For amorphous layers created a t low temperature the threshold energy density Eihfor recrystallization increases with increasing layer thickness, if the thickness of the amorphous layers exceeds the absorption length dabs for the used laser light (see Table 2). However, implantation at room temperature creates layer structures consisting of an amorphous layer and an underlying crystalline damaged layer with a highly elevated absorption coefficient [13]. I n these cases the conditions for the laser energy deposition are modified especially for the wavelength A = 1.06 pm, and the connection between the molten depth and the laser energy density is not so definite.…”
Section: Recrystallixationmentioning
confidence: 99%