2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.2153-960x.2011.00516.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defeating Phenomenal Conservatism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent criticisms of the phenomenal thesis have brought our attention to two kinds of counterexamples. First, it is argued that various strange or even dangerous propositions can appear true to us, such as “This walnut tree was planted on April 24, 1914,” or “Religion X is true, and we should kill anyone who does not subscribe to X” (Littlejohn, 2011; Markie, 2005; Tooley, 2013). It would be excessively permissive to grant justification to these propositions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent criticisms of the phenomenal thesis have brought our attention to two kinds of counterexamples. First, it is argued that various strange or even dangerous propositions can appear true to us, such as “This walnut tree was planted on April 24, 1914,” or “Religion X is true, and we should kill anyone who does not subscribe to X” (Littlejohn, 2011; Markie, 2005; Tooley, 2013). It would be excessively permissive to grant justification to these propositions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%