2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deepest View of AGN X-Ray Variability with the 7 Ms Chandra Deep Field-South Survey

Abstract: We systematically analyze X-ray variability of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) in the 7 Ms Chandra Deep Field-South survey. On the longest timescale (≈ 17 years), we find only weak (if any) dependence of Xray variability amplitudes on energy bands or obscuration. We use four different power spectral density (PSD) models to fit the anti-correlation between normalized excess variance (σ 2 nxv ) and luminosity, and obtain a best-fit power law index β = 1.16 +0.05 −0.05 for the low-frequency part of AGN PSD. We also… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
4
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the detection limit of the 7 Ms CDF-S is a function of off-axis angle, we divide the central r = 8 FOV into a series of narrow concentric annuli with a width of ∆r to determine the minimum 0.5-7 keV counts of an X-ray source required for a detection in each annulus, i.e., the detection limit in each annular region. Following the original transient-searching procedure 14 and considering that the background of the 7 Ms CDF-S is stable 17 , we assume a background region 10 times that of the source region and estimate the expected background counts for the source in a 70 ks observation (i.e., the exposure of ObsID 16453) using the mean background count rate of the 7 Ms CDF-S 17 . The fluctuation (σ) of the background counts is given by the Poisson distribution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the detection limit of the 7 Ms CDF-S is a function of off-axis angle, we divide the central r = 8 FOV into a series of narrow concentric annuli with a width of ∆r to determine the minimum 0.5-7 keV counts of an X-ray source required for a detection in each annulus, i.e., the detection limit in each annular region. Following the original transient-searching procedure 14 and considering that the background of the 7 Ms CDF-S is stable 17 , we assume a background region 10 times that of the source region and estimate the expected background counts for the source in a 70 ks observation (i.e., the exposure of ObsID 16453) using the mean background count rate of the 7 Ms CDF-S 17 . The fluctuation (σ) of the background counts is given by the Poisson distribution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…South survey (CDF-S), which consists of 102 individual Chandra/Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer imaging array (ACIS-I) observations spanning 16.4 yrs 17,18 , we performed a search for X-ray transient events and discovered two notable fast outbursts 14 , with one dubbed CDF-S XT1 and reported elsewhere 13 and CDF-S XT2 being the focus here. The We present the binned Chandra 0.5-7 keV light curves and spectra of CDF-S XT2 in Figure 1 for viewing purposes, and fit the unbinned light curves and spectra for physical constraints (see Methods).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are listed in Table 9. To check whether our calculation of σ 2 nxv is affected by the limited counts (e.g., Zheng et al 2017; hereafter Z17), we perform Spearman rank correlation tests and find no significant correlation between σ 2 nxv,F , σ 2 nxv,N , σ 2 nxv,L and counts with Spearman's ρ = 0.07, p-value = 0.70; ρ = −0.11, p-value = 0.56 and ρ = 0.32, p-value = 0.08, respectively. We also calculate the fractional root-mean-square (frms) variability amplitude, which is defined as σ 2 nxv for sources having σ 2 nxv > 0 and can be treated as the percentage of the variability amplitude.…”
Section: Variability Amplitude Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the observed α OX value of an AGN is lower than that expected from the α OX -L 2500 Å relation (∆α OX = α OX − α OX,exp < 0, where more negative values indicate more extreme X-ray weakness relative to the 2500 Å monochromatic luminosity), it is X-ray weak by a linear factor of f weak = 10 −∆αOX/0.384 . X-ray luminosity variability is a characteristic property of AGNs, which is generally related to instabilities of the corona or fluctuations of the accretion flow (e.g., Nandra 2001;McHardy et al 2006;MacLeod et al 2010;Yang et al 2016;Zheng et al 2017). The intrinsic X-ray variability of AGNs contributes partially to the dispersion of the α OX -L 2500 Å relation (e.g., Vagnetti et al 2010;Gibson & Brandt 2012;Vagnetti et al 2013;Chiaraluce et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%