2018
DOI: 10.1080/21505594.2018.1475795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep sequencing of the mouse lung transcriptome reveals distinct long non-coding RNAs expression associated with the high virulence of H5N1 avian influenza virus in mice

Abstract: Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play multiple key regulatory roles in various biological processes. However, their function in influenza A virus (IAV) pathogenicity remains largely unexplored. Here, using next generation sequencing, we systemically compared the whole-transcriptome response of the mouse lung infected with either the highly pathogenic (A/Chicken/Jiangsu/k0402/2010, CK10) or the nonpathogenic (A/Goose/Jiangsu/k0403/2010, GS10) H5N1 virus. A total of 126 significantly differentially expressed (SDE)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These distinct expression profiles of lncRNAs in cells infected with different strains of IAV suggest an association between the expression of lncRNAs and host susceptibility to different IAV infections [22]. In support of the above observations, deep sequencing of lung RNA in mice that were challenged with a highly pathogenic (A/Chicken/Jiangsu/k0402/ 2010) or a much less virulent (A/Goose/Jiangsu/ k0403/2010) avian influenza virus H5N1 also showed distinct expression of numerous lncRNAs in response to these two viruses, and the lncRNA profiles are correlated with viral pathogenicity in mice [23]. These comprehensive studies have used different approaches to investigate the response of lncRNA expression to IAV infection under various conditions, including infection with different IAV strains, avian influenza virus with different pathogenicity, in different cell lines, or in mice.…”
Section: Cellular Lncrna Expression Is Altered By Iav Infectionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…These distinct expression profiles of lncRNAs in cells infected with different strains of IAV suggest an association between the expression of lncRNAs and host susceptibility to different IAV infections [22]. In support of the above observations, deep sequencing of lung RNA in mice that were challenged with a highly pathogenic (A/Chicken/Jiangsu/k0402/ 2010) or a much less virulent (A/Goose/Jiangsu/ k0403/2010) avian influenza virus H5N1 also showed distinct expression of numerous lncRNAs in response to these two viruses, and the lncRNA profiles are correlated with viral pathogenicity in mice [23]. These comprehensive studies have used different approaches to investigate the response of lncRNA expression to IAV infection under various conditions, including infection with different IAV strains, avian influenza virus with different pathogenicity, in different cell lines, or in mice.…”
Section: Cellular Lncrna Expression Is Altered By Iav Infectionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…With the increasing progress of transcriptomic technology, lung transcriptome sequencing has been studied extensively. The transcriptome sequence of the lung in mice infected with influenza A virus [ 29 ] and that of the PRRSV infection in porcine lungs [ 30 ] have been analyzed. Meanwhile, other research focuses on transcriptome analysis of sick or cancerous lungs [ 31 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That explains the relatively high representation of RNA-encoding DEGs in our results. Moreover, mammalian long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) were reported to play critical roles in the immune response to influenza A virus infection [33], and some lncRNAs were identified as being related to the immune response to influenza A virus in ducks [34]; however, the roles of many non-coding RNAs remain to be discovered. Interestingly, the proportion of RNAencoding DEGs of all DEGs is far less in broilers (the Ross [2x] group) than in all remaining groups (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%