2010
DOI: 10.1680/geot.8.p.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep-penetrating spudcan foundations on layered clays: numerical analysis

Abstract: This paper presents results of large deformation finite element (LDFE) analyses that investigate the penetration response of deep-penetrating spudcan foundations in stratified soil comprising a strong clay layer overlying weaker clay. Such strength profiles give rise to potential punchthrough failure, with a local maximum penetration resistance followed by some reduction. The paper is a companion paper to one that presents results from centrifuge model tests of the same problem, with the overall aim being to i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trapped sand underneath the ball was found to have a significant influence on the penetration resistance in the bottom clay layer. This was similar to spudcan penetration in layered soils (Hossain & Randolph, 2010a, 2010b, but on a different scale (i.e. spudcan diameter % 12 m).…”
Section: Previous Worksupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The trapped sand underneath the ball was found to have a significant influence on the penetration resistance in the bottom clay layer. This was similar to spudcan penetration in layered soils (Hossain & Randolph, 2010a, 2010b, but on a different scale (i.e. spudcan diameter % 12 m).…”
Section: Previous Worksupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The advantage of RITSS is that the remeshing and interpolation strategy can be coupled with any standard FE program, such as the locally developed program AFENA [7] and the commercial package Abaqus/Standard, through user-written interface codes. The potential of the approach has been highlighted by varied two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) applications of monotonic and cyclic penetration of penetrometers [19,52], penetration of spudcan foundations for mobile jack-up rigs [16,17,51], lateral buckling of pipelines [49,8] and uplift capacity and keying of mooring anchors [31,[43][44][45]47,38,39]. More recently, RITSS was extended from static to dynamic analyses [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison between the results from centrifuge tests and LDFE analyses are presented by Hossain & Randolph (2009d). Overall, excellent agreement was found in terms of key features of the flow mechanisms: surface heave, cavity depth, layer deformation, trapped stronger material beneath the spudcan, and the failure pattern generated due to penetration of the spudcan foundation.…”
Section: Evolution Of a New Design Approachmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Hossain (2008) illustrated all the results separately based on t/D and s ubs /s ut for kD/s ubs = 0 and kD/s ubs > 0. However, the revealed soil flow mechanisms and resulting bearing capacity profiles (Hossain & Randolph, 2009d) provide evidence that the underlying soft layer influences spudcan performance well before the punch-through point, with the penetration resistance being lower than that for a deep layer of the upper clay. Young et al, 1984;Castleberry II & Prebaharan, 1985;Craig & Higham, 1985;Brennan et al, 2006).…”
Section: Bearing Capacitymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation