2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97669-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep neural network for detecting arbitrary precision peptide features through attention based segmentation

Abstract: A promising technique of discovering disease biomarkers is to measure the relative protein abundance in multiple biofluid samples through liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) based quantitative proteomics. The key step involves peptide feature detection in the LC-MS map, along with its charge and intensity. Existing heuristic algorithms suffer from inaccurate parameters and human errors. As a solution, we propose PointIso, the first point cloud based arbitrary-precision deep learning … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of de novo sequencing, de novo peptides can be put into a new database and an additional database search is performed to estimate the FDR of de novo peptides. Deep learning applications are employed at multiple stages throughout the platform, including MS1 isotope feature detection 24 , 25 , de novo sequencing for both DDA and DIA 23 , 26 , 27 , spectrum, retention time, and collision cross section predictions 28 30 (Supplementary Figs. 1 , 2 , Supplementary Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of de novo sequencing, de novo peptides can be put into a new database and an additional database search is performed to estimate the FDR of de novo peptides. Deep learning applications are employed at multiple stages throughout the platform, including MS1 isotope feature detection 24 , 25 , de novo sequencing for both DDA and DIA 23 , 26 , 27 , spectrum, retention time, and collision cross section predictions 28 30 (Supplementary Figs. 1 , 2 , Supplementary Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method, PepPre, is compared with pParse, RawConverter, Monocle, Decon2LS, RAPID, , MaxQuant, Dinosaur, PointIso, and three enumeration-based methods (EnumInst, EnumIW, EnumEx), as summarized in Table . Being marked as “no” in ‘coelution?’ indicates that the method only performs isotope correction to the precursors provided by the instrument and cannot report other coeluted precursor ions, which may cause significant identification loss.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method, PepPre, is compared with pParse, 17 Raw-Converter, 16 Monocle, 32 Decon2LS, 33 RAPID, 13,14 Max-Quant, 22 Dinosaur, 24 PointIso, 26 and three enumerationbased methods (EnumInst, EnumIW, EnumEx), as summarized in Table 1. Being marked as "no" in 'coelution?'…”
Section: Data Sets and Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations