2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2022.108919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning of longitudinal mammogram examinations for breast cancer risk prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mammogram images are generally large in size, but due to limitations in GPU resources, it is often necessary to downsample the images to a smaller size for general deep learning models. Mammogram image sizes used in previous mammography-based risk prediction studies varied from 224×224 20,44 , 256×256 45 , 299×299 17 , 632×512 46 , and 2048×1664 19,21,23 . Considering the trade-off of the GPU memory and the number of historical mammograms used in this study, the input mammograms are resized to the size of 1024×512.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mammogram images are generally large in size, but due to limitations in GPU resources, it is often necessary to downsample the images to a smaller size for general deep learning models. Mammogram image sizes used in previous mammography-based risk prediction studies varied from 224×224 20,44 , 256×256 45 , 299×299 17 , 632×512 46 , and 2048×1664 19,21,23 . Considering the trade-off of the GPU memory and the number of historical mammograms used in this study, the input mammograms are resized to the size of 1024×512.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performances in clinical practice remain modest, as they lack sensitivity to short/middle-term cancer risk variation due to the limited incorporation of individual-specific risk factors (detailed imaging characteristics) beyond breast density. In recent years, deep learning (DL) methods combining large screening mammography datasets with detailed risk factors have shown promise in balancing the harmto-benefit ratios of BC screening 7,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22] and have even been validated in clinical settings 23 . For instance, the recent MIRAI risk model 19 achieved state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance in five-year BC risk prediction and outperformed the clinically adopted traditional models 19,[23][24][25] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only a few models overlook the potential value of considering longitudinal mammographic changes 3 where both historical and current mammograms are utilized as inputs in their deep learning model. In previous studies 4 , 5 by incorporating longitudinal mammogram examinations, the specifically designed deep learning models have shown better performance for breast cancer risk predicting task, which shows that changes in the breast tissue over time can provide critical insights into the risk of breast cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performances of these risk models remain modest in clinical practice and are not very sensitive to short/middle-term cancer risk variation due to the shortage of individual-specific risk adaptation, for example through the incorporation of detailed imaging findings beyond breast density only. With the recent boost in deep learning (DL) methods, some studies that combined large screening mammography datasets with detailed risk factors have shown considerable promise to help balance the harm-to-benefit ratios of BC screening (7,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22) and were even validated in clinical settings (23). For example, a recent study (19) developed a risk model, MIRAI, that achieved state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance in five-year BC risk prediction and outperformed the clinically adopted traditional models (19,(23)(24)(25).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%