2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.06.28.23291994
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting up to 10 year breast cancer risk using longitudinal mammographic screening history

Abstract: Risk assessment of breast cancer (BC) seeks to enhance individualized screening and prevention strategies. BC risk informs healthy individuals of the short- and long-term likelihood of cancer development, also enabling detection of existing BC. Recent mammographic-based deep learning (DL) risk models outperform traditional risk factor-based models and achieve state-of-the-art (SOTA) at short-term risk prediction, but mainly use single-time exams, which seem to rely more on detecting existing lesions. We presen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study carried out by Wang et al. ( 64 ) presents the Multi-Time Point Breast Cancer Risk Model (MTP-BCR), an advanced DL risk assessment tool. A large-scale in-house dataset consisting of 171,168 screening mammograms of 9,133 women was used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study carried out by Wang et al. ( 64 ) presents the Multi-Time Point Breast Cancer Risk Model (MTP-BCR), an advanced DL risk assessment tool. A large-scale in-house dataset consisting of 171,168 screening mammograms of 9,133 women was used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al. ( 64 ) introduced the Multi-Time Point Breast Cancer Risk Model, significantly improving long-term risk prediction. These findings emphasize the potential of advanced AI in breast cancer risk assessment and early detection, although further validation in diverse cohorts is vital for its clinical implementation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%