2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2111.02736
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning Methods for Daily Wildfire Danger Forecasting

Abstract: Wildfire forecasting is of paramount importance for disaster risk reduction and environmental sustainability. We approach daily fire danger prediction as a machine learning task, using historical Earth observation data from the last decade to predict next-day's fire danger. To that end, we collect, pre-process and harmonize an openaccess datacube, featuring a set of covariates that jointly affect the fire occurrence and spread, such as weather conditions, satellite-derived products, topography features and var… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scientific community [100] has been discussing the selection of a spatial scale for studying wildfire forecasting. The spatial scale of distribution-based approaches varies from fine-scale grids, which are typically 1 km x 1 km or smaller [101][102][103][104], to larger scales of approximately 10 km × 10 km [105][106][107], multiscalar [108,109] or by using computerized and artificial intelligence techniques [110,111]. Initially, two scale levels were selected: level 8 (7774 km s 2 ) and level 9 (2591 km s 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scientific community [100] has been discussing the selection of a spatial scale for studying wildfire forecasting. The spatial scale of distribution-based approaches varies from fine-scale grids, which are typically 1 km x 1 km or smaller [101][102][103][104], to larger scales of approximately 10 km × 10 km [105][106][107], multiscalar [108,109] or by using computerized and artificial intelligence techniques [110,111]. Initially, two scale levels were selected: level 8 (7774 km s 2 ) and level 9 (2591 km s 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predicting fire danger with ML is not straightforward and poses some challenges (Prapas et al, 2021), which are important to address:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher accuracy of 95.81% was achieved, outperforming four benchmark models that are multilayer perceptron neural networks, random forests, kernel logistic regression, and SVM. Prapas et al [117] proposed a DL method, named ConvLSTM, for forest fire danger forecasting in the regions of Greece. The Datacube dataset [118] was used in training and testing this model.…”
Section: Deep Learning-based Approaches For Fire Susceptibility Using...mentioning
confidence: 99%