2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-44289-7_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning in Breast Cancer Detection and Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hamed et al [ 32 ] proposed using the You Only Look Once (YOLO) and RetinaNet models for breast cancer recognition while achieving 91% accuracy of five mammogram image datasets. Ak [ 33 ] discussed various approaches of machine learning and applied them to the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WBCD) dataset, focusing on comparative analysis and data visualization.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hamed et al [ 32 ] proposed using the You Only Look Once (YOLO) and RetinaNet models for breast cancer recognition while achieving 91% accuracy of five mammogram image datasets. Ak [ 33 ] discussed various approaches of machine learning and applied them to the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WBCD) dataset, focusing on comparative analysis and data visualization.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) is a class of neural network, that consists of some hidden states, which uses the output of previous state as an input of next state. It can process a sequence of inputs that uses the same parameters at each layer which reduces the complexity of that parameters more accurately than the other neural networks but it can not process a large number of sequence of inputs through ReLU and Tanh activation functions [58], [64].…”
Section: E Recurrent Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, with the huge number of mammograms screened daily, the process becomes hard, lengthy, complex and time consumable for radiologists and consequently in many cases, it pruned to errors [3]. Since radiologists till now miss between [10%-30%] of cancers either by taking decisions for some cases as benign despite their malignancy (false negative) or requiring additional screens due to their doubt about malignant tumors despite they are benign (false positive) [4], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%