2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-06028-6_74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning for Character-Based Information Extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most popular word segmentation methods is based on sequence labeling (Xue, 2003). Recently, researchers have tended to explore neural network based approaches (Collobert et al, 2011) to reduce efforts of feature engineering (Zheng et al, 2013;Pei et al, 2014;Qi et al, 2014;. The features of all these methods are extracted from a local context and neglect the long distance information.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular word segmentation methods is based on sequence labeling (Xue, 2003). Recently, researchers have tended to explore neural network based approaches (Collobert et al, 2011) to reduce efforts of feature engineering (Zheng et al, 2013;Pei et al, 2014;Qi et al, 2014;. The features of all these methods are extracted from a local context and neglect the long distance information.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most modern CWS methods followed (Xue, 2003) treated CWS as a sequence labeling problems (Zhao et al, 2006b). Recently, researchers have tended to explore neural network based approaches (Collobert et al, 2011) to reduce efforts of feature engineering (Zheng et al, 2013;Qi et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2015a;Chen et al, 2015b). They modeled CWS as tagging problem as well, scoring tags on individual characters.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turian et al (2010),Collobert et al (2011), andQi et al (2014) consider representation learning for coarse label named entity recognition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%