2021
DOI: 10.1049/smt2.12039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning–based surface contamination severity prediction of metal oxide surge arrester in power system

Abstract: This paper presents an advanced technique based on cross-Stockwell transform (XST) and sparse autoencoder to predict the surface contamination severity of metal oxide surge arrester (MOSA) employing leakage current signal. Generally, MOSAs in power system network are exposed to different environmental conditions where its condition may degrade due to accumulation of pollutants, which may cause premature failure of it. Hence, system reliability can get affected. Therefore, monitoring the surface condition of MO… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work [22] lists innovative extensions created after establishing the content of Appendix D of the standard. These include works [24][25][26][27][28], which analyze various techniques for analyzing the current signal-both with only the total leakage current and additionally with a separate resistive component, allowing the amplitude and shift angles in the current signal for the components to be obtained-total and/or resistive [24][25][26], as well as leading to the determination of the shape and similarity of current signals recorded in a synchronous manner [27,28]. On the other hand, in the work [23], a number of improved classical methods have been compiled that allow its resistive component to be obtained from the current signal, specifying the limitations of their use, of which the presence of higher harmonics in the supply voltage was indicated in the first place.…”
Section: Methods Of Diagnosing Surge Arrestersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work [22] lists innovative extensions created after establishing the content of Appendix D of the standard. These include works [24][25][26][27][28], which analyze various techniques for analyzing the current signal-both with only the total leakage current and additionally with a separate resistive component, allowing the amplitude and shift angles in the current signal for the components to be obtained-total and/or resistive [24][25][26], as well as leading to the determination of the shape and similarity of current signals recorded in a synchronous manner [27,28]. On the other hand, in the work [23], a number of improved classical methods have been compiled that allow its resistive component to be obtained from the current signal, specifying the limitations of their use, of which the presence of higher harmonics in the supply voltage was indicated in the first place.…”
Section: Methods Of Diagnosing Surge Arrestersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amorim et al [10] proposed using a high frequency current transformer (HFCT) to sense the grounding cable conductor current of a surge arrester to obtain its PD signal, and used the phase resolved partial discharge (PRPD) spectrum to evaluate its state. Das et al [11] proposed utilizing the leakage current of surge arresters to identify the severity of surface contamination based on cross-stockwell transform and a sparse autoencoder. Metwally et al [12] proposed an online monitoring method using prony analysis-Hilbert transform based on feature extraction of the frequencies, phase angles, and magnitudes of all frequency components for the surge arrester considering pollution and dry conditions when measuring the total leakage current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%