2021
DOI: 10.1080/08839514.2021.1975391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning Based Steel Pipe Weld Defect Detection

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand the behavior of the AI model, model interpretation tools such as Heat maps and Grad CAM tools are used. A U-Net architecture-based model is presented in [13], a method based on YOLOv5 model demonstrated in [14] which uses X-Ray images for detection of pipeline weld defects, the results indicated that YOLOv5 performs better than R-CNN interns of metrics such as speed of detection and classification accuracy. The detection of cracks which are thin, irregular in shape and with complex texture background in the image makes crack detection task challenging.…”
Section: Pretrained Models For Pipeline Health Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the behavior of the AI model, model interpretation tools such as Heat maps and Grad CAM tools are used. A U-Net architecture-based model is presented in [13], a method based on YOLOv5 model demonstrated in [14] which uses X-Ray images for detection of pipeline weld defects, the results indicated that YOLOv5 performs better than R-CNN interns of metrics such as speed of detection and classification accuracy. The detection of cracks which are thin, irregular in shape and with complex texture background in the image makes crack detection task challenging.…”
Section: Pretrained Models For Pipeline Health Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feng [16] added FcaNet (Frequency Channel Attention Networks) and CBAM (Convolutional Block Attention Module) on the basis of Res-Net, the dataset contained 1360 images, and the parameter quantity was 26.038 M. The dataset was small, and the model was large. Yang [17] used YOLOV5X (You Only Look Once) to detect steel pipe welding defects. The accuracy was 98.7, but the inference speed was 120 ms, which did not meet the real-time industrial requirements.…”
Section: Overall Framework and Algorithm Structure Of Steel Plate Def...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three filters, and each filter is a 3 × 3 convolution kernel. (1) YOLOV5 YOLOV5 [17,27,28] mainly consists of Backbone, Neck and Head. Mosaic data enhancement, adaptive anchor box calculation and adaptive image scaling were added to the data input part to process the data and increase the detection accuracy.…”
Section: Model Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Du et al [24] devised Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to reduce the difficulty of parameter adjustment and improve the stability of the seam tracking system. Yang et al [25] realized the latest single-stage target detection algorithm YOLOv5 applied to the field of steel pipe weld defect detection, which can improve the detection accuracy of welding quality. Pan et al [26] devised a new transfer learning model based on MobileNet as a feature extraction tool for welding defects, with fast speed and prediction accuracy of 97.69%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%