2022
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ac5a38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An active visual monitoring method for GMAW weld surface defects based on random forest model

Abstract: In the automatic manufacturing of robotic welding, real-time monitoring of weld quality is a difficult problem. Meanwhile, due to volatilization of zinc vapor in galvanized steel and complexity of welding process, the existence of welding defects greatly affects industrial production process. And real-time detection of welding defects is a key step in development of intelligent welding. To realize real-time monitoring of weld surface defects, an active visual monitoring method for weld surface defects is propo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also helps to identify the different sizes and scales for the same object. Finally, the head is same as the YOLOv3 and v4 versions, and is used to perform the detection with vectors of class probabilities, objectness scores, and bounding boxes [43]. The YOLOv5 architecture is shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Yolov5 Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also helps to identify the different sizes and scales for the same object. Finally, the head is same as the YOLOv3 and v4 versions, and is used to perform the detection with vectors of class probabilities, objectness scores, and bounding boxes [43]. The YOLOv5 architecture is shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Yolov5 Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourier transform [4], Gabor filter [5], SVM (Support Vector Machine) [6] and Random Forest [7]. However, there are limitations of algorithms above: the artificial feature extraction cannot express information adequately under complex circumstances, defect performance is highly affected by human-generated feature extractors, problems like huge computations, locations and sizes of defects are still difficult to solve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the wide application of intelligent welding defect detection instruments in engineering practice, how to accurately identify welding defects under complex constraints has become a research hotspot, and the existing research results demonstrate that the performance of welding defect recognition models based on artificial neural networks is particularly outstanding [10][11][12][13]. Welding defect recognition based on neural networks [14,15] involves selecting the parameters sensitive to defects as the input of the neural network, training the neural network through the defect data in the numerical simulation and finally applying the trained network to the detection of metal parts to realize the automatic identification of defects [16][17][18][19][20]. Ma et al constructed a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to identify the spectrum graphs, realizing the online detection of porosity [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%