2022
DOI: 10.3390/s22124321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning Based Muti-Objective Reactive Power Optimization of Distribution Network with PV and EVs

Abstract: With the high penetration of photovoltaic (PV) and electric vehicle (EV) charging and replacement power stations connected to the distribution network, problems such as the increase of line loss and voltage deviation of the distribution network are becoming increasingly prominent. The application of traditional reactive power compensation devices and the change of transformer taps has struggled to meet the needs of reactive power optimization of the distribution network. It is urgent to present new reactive po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [77], the authors used both computational intelligence methods and analytical methods. In [55], five multi-objective evolution algorithms (MOEAs), named promising-region-based evolutionary many-objective algorithm (PREA), strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm 2 (SPEA 2), nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), nondominated sorting genetic algorithm III (NSGA-III), and two-phase framework (ToP), are used to determine the reactive power capacity of PVs and EVs. The results obtained by MOEAs are used to train a deep deconvolution neural network (DDNN) to solve the problem of voltage deviation and loss minimization.…”
Section: Computational Intelligence Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [77], the authors used both computational intelligence methods and analytical methods. In [55], five multi-objective evolution algorithms (MOEAs), named promising-region-based evolutionary many-objective algorithm (PREA), strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm 2 (SPEA 2), nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), nondominated sorting genetic algorithm III (NSGA-III), and two-phase framework (ToP), are used to determine the reactive power capacity of PVs and EVs. The results obtained by MOEAs are used to train a deep deconvolution neural network (DDNN) to solve the problem of voltage deviation and loss minimization.…”
Section: Computational Intelligence Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to voltage optimization, the following objectives also appear: (i) power loss minimization [53][54][55], (ii) on load tap changer (OLTC) switching operation minimization [56], (iii) PV cost minimization [38], (iv) reactive power injection/absorption minimization [57], (v) active power curtailment (APC) minimization [58], (vi) cost of purchased energy minimization [59], (vii) peak shaving minimization [59], and (viii) security margin index (SMI) minimization [59]. The mathematical expressions of the commonly used objectives are given in Table 2.…”
Section: General Formulation-objectives and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The algorithm's effectiveness is demonstrated through a case study on the South Korean distribution system, confirming significant improvement in system performance through optimized smart inverter settings. The author in [81] addresses the challenges of increased line losses and voltage deviations in distribution networks due to high PV and EV penetration. The study proposes new reactive power regulation methods, utilizing the potential of PVs and EVs, to alleviate these challenges.…”
Section: Control and Optimization Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the suggested solutions, some are based on the usage of electrical storage [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ], and some of them apply power flow dispatch at generating facilities [ 5 , 6 ]. Other solutions are based on the utilization of reactive power equipment [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Considering the influence of the high costs of high-voltage storage, reactive power usage as the voltage regulation model may be preferable among other methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%