2022
DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2022.3152225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning-Based Microbubble Localization for Ultrasound Localization Microscopy

Abstract: Ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM) is an emerging vascular imaging technique that overcomes the resolution-penetration compromise of ultrasound imaging. Accurate and robust microbubble (MB) localization is essential for successful ULM. In this study, we present a deep learning (DL)based localization technique that uses both Field-II simulation and in vivo chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) data for training. Both radiofrequency (RF) and in-phase quadrature (IQ) data were tested in this study. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike our presented work, it does not include biological factors such as tumor-induced angiogenesis or the effects of anti-angiogenic substances. Other recent and more technical publications include the use of the CAM model for the application of ultrasound localization microscopy, which utilizes a CNN to visualize microvessels [ 59 , 60 ]. Li et al talk about the difficulty of obtaining the large in vivo training datasets required to train previously used cross-correlation-based localization methods combatted by the improved learning scheme of CNNs, though only using ex ovo CAM assay training data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike our presented work, it does not include biological factors such as tumor-induced angiogenesis or the effects of anti-angiogenic substances. Other recent and more technical publications include the use of the CAM model for the application of ultrasound localization microscopy, which utilizes a CNN to visualize microvessels [ 59 , 60 ]. Li et al talk about the difficulty of obtaining the large in vivo training datasets required to train previously used cross-correlation-based localization methods combatted by the improved learning scheme of CNNs, though only using ex ovo CAM assay training data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…injection of high MB concentration or in-paint the ULM image); they suffer from the uncertainty of the number of iterations, inaccurate estimated point spread function (PSF) and exhaustive parameter optimization to achieve an optimal image quality. Additionally, 2D deep learning based ULM (deep-ULM) approaches [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] have been actively developed recently to improve this issue. Deep-ULMs used neural networks to extract features of the MB signal during the training process and then make predictions to identify MB signals, resulting in fast recognition of MB signals and microvascular reconstruction even at high MB concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Training data generation: First we would like to point out unlike methods shown in [12], training data generated by simulations were not employed in our experiments for following consideration. It seems that oscillations of MBs are not considered in above mentioned paper and essentially, MBs and normal scatters suffer different underlying physical disciplines when insonified by ultrasound beam [13].…”
Section: A Deep Learning Based Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Loss function: Besides conventional L 1 loss [12], dice loss was added to the total loss, increasing the convergence speed of training in our experiments. When using dice loss, one threshold was pre-set to segment the heatmap (label) to foreground and background.…”
Section: A Deep Learning Based Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%