2007
DOI: 10.1086/512669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DeepXMM‐NewtonandChandraObservations of Cl J1226.9+3332: A Detailed X‐Ray Mass Analysis of az= 0.89 Galaxy Cluster

Abstract: Deep XMM-Newton and Chandra observations of Cl J1226.9+3332 at z ¼ 0:89 have enabled the most detailed X-ray mass analysis of any such high-redshift galaxy cluster. The XMM-Newton temperature profile of the system shows no sign of central cooling, with a hot core and a radially declining profile. A temperature map shows asymmetry with a hot region that appears to be associated with a subclump of galaxies at the cluster redshift but is not visible in the X-ray surface brightness. This is likely to be the result… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
107
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
19
107
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Any cool component in the core is expected to bias downwards the emission-weighted cluster temperature. We have checked the statistical effect of this bias by considering the sample of 90 clusters with temperatures >4 keV for which Maughan et al (2007) obtained from Chandra observations a measure of the temperature both in the range (0−1)R 500 and in the range (0.15−1)R 500 . We obtain a mean T 0.15−1 /T 0−1 of 1.01, with a dispersion of 0.14, suggesting that, even though on average a cool core does not significantly affect the cluster temperature, the scatter in the distribution of the measured temperatures can be high.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Any cool component in the core is expected to bias downwards the emission-weighted cluster temperature. We have checked the statistical effect of this bias by considering the sample of 90 clusters with temperatures >4 keV for which Maughan et al (2007) obtained from Chandra observations a measure of the temperature both in the range (0−1)R 500 and in the range (0.15−1)R 500 . We obtain a mean T 0.15−1 /T 0−1 of 1.01, with a dispersion of 0.14, suggesting that, even though on average a cool core does not significantly affect the cluster temperature, the scatter in the distribution of the measured temperatures can be high.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study this effect, we have considered the measurements of the centroid shift for the 43 objects in common with the sample of 90 clusters analysed by Maughan et al (2007) with T gas > 4 keV. We consider as relaxed objects the 18 clusters with a centroid shift lower than the median value of 1.18 × 10 −2 measured over the entire sample of 115 clusters (see their Table 2).…”
Section: Robustness To Systematic Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where we set b = c/0.45 (as suggested in Maughan et al 2007) and therefore we are left with 7 free parameters. This functional form is usually taken to represent the 3D temperature distribution, and projected to be fit to the observed projected temperature profile.…”
Section: Deprojection and Mass Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…RX J1226.9+3332 (Maughan et al 2007): the same quantities were measured in this case: T = 10.4 ± 0.6 keV, z = 0.89 and f X [0.5,2] keV = 3.27 × 10 −13 erg/s/cm 2 (Vikhlinin et al 2009a). Moreover, the observation of the temperature profile, combined with the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium, enabled a determination of the total mass and gas mass profiles, and thus an estimate of the cluster mass: M 500 = 5.2 +1.0 −0.8 × 10 14 M .…”
Section: Xmm-newton Follow-up Of the New Planck Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%